Alec Difrawi Scum Attorney Thomas A Sadaka Disbarred

This comes as no surprised to me and others who Mr. Sadaka aggressively filed false complaints leveraging his past experienced as a State Prosecutor with the Ninth Circuit of Orange County.

Sadaka was fully aware of the scam and had knowledge of the FTC investigations as he continue to file multiple false cases before the courts.

Member Profile

Thomas Sadaka <tom@sadakalaw.com>Mar 12, 2015, 5:15 AM
to me

Anything that you were to be served with you were served. I’m not required to serve you with a request for a certified or exemplified copy of a judgment. 

Sent from my iPhone please excuse any typographical errors. 
On Mar 11, 2015, at 10:38 PM, scamFRAUDalert <scamfraudalert@gmail.com> wrote:

The question is, why did you not ensure that copies were send to me initially?
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Thomas Sadaka <tom@sadakalaw.com> wrote:

There was no document attached.  I have gone to the ePortal and pulled some of the other documents that were filed by co-counsel Attorney Braeley.  The notice of filing and the exhibits are attached.  I’ve also attached the one “exemplified certificate” that I could pull.   

Thomas A. Sadaka, LL.M.

Sadaka Law Group, PLC
1701 Park Center Drive
Orlando, FL 32835
407-278-5728

Sadaka Law Group, PLC
1420 Celebration Blvd, Suite 200
Celebration, FL 34747
407-566-2110

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Please note that the views expressed herein or in any attachments hereto are not intended

On March 6, 2015 at 6:08 PM scamFRAUDalert <scamfraudalert@gmail.com> wrote:Mr. Sadaka:
The attached document was not provided me in your attached Exhibits. provided me. I do not have a copy of Exhibit 4.  Again, I can not determine if you are being truthful or not. I will need  the Clerk stamped copies of documents to appropriately response to your Order to show Cause.
You’ve stated :

” I am not asking the Court to hold you accountable for things that are beyond your control.  The posting I have referenced in my most recent Motion for Order to Show Cause, and forwarded as exhibits, are posted directly on sites that you own and are under your control.”

Yet you have not provided the Court with the WhoIs information to show that I have ownership of websites you claimed to have posting referencing your client. 
I am going to make it crystal clear to you, I am going to need from you  going forward on all communication you submit to the Court to provide me with a stamped copy of your submission so that there is no discrepancies between what you say or provide me.
Please provide me with copies of Exhibit 4.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Respectfully,

Archie Garga-Richardson dba scamFRAUDalert

Your cooperation would be greatly appreciated.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Thomas Sadaka <tom@sadakalaw.com> wrote:

Mr. Garga-Richardson,

I am not asking the Court to hold you accountable for things that are beyond your control.  The posting I have referenced in my most recent Motion for Order to Show Cause, and forwarded as exhibits, are posted directly on sites that you own and are under your control.  A perfect example is reflected in the attached document.  The requested remove these posts is not an unreasonable one.  Take them down and we can then address the Order to Show Cause.  If you recall the hearing in front of Judge Wallis, I made the same request.  The posts that the Judge referenced and were further discussed during the “Agreed Order” conversation were ones that appear to have been reposts of your own posts.  The Agreed Order would have allowed for a deindexing of those URLs from search results.  I am still in a position to be able to afford you the opportunity to cooperate in the formation of that Agreed Order as well.

I will not be sending you copies of the requests for exemplified copies as there is no document.  There is no pleading that was filed.  There was a request made of the Clerk for an exemplified copy of the final judgment, and the Clerk provided same.

You are also welcome to contact the Clerk’s office to determine if you are eligible for the electronic filing service that will also give you access to all of the pleadings filed in this matter since its inception. 

Thomas A. Sadaka, LL.M.

Sadaka Law Group, PLC
1701 Park Center Drive
Orlando, FL 32835
407-278-5728

Sadaka Law Group, PLC
1420 Celebration Blvd, Suite 200
Celebration, FL 34747
407-566-2110

On March 6, 2015 at 12:07 PM scamFRAUDalert < scamfraudalert@gmail.com> wrote:Dear Sadaka:
I did not expect your recollection to mirror mine. No surprises here. However, you do remembered that Judge Rand Wallis vacated his Contempt/Enforcement Order asking us to fashion some sort of agreement that would accommodate you and your client? 


I too do not play games. Based on my experienced in dealing with your client, he provides you and other Attorneys with fraudulent documents for filing in Court. Again, please provide me with all documents requested pursuant to Fla. Code of Civil Procedures 1.080 as requested Court certified copies. There are documents on the Court docket filed since  2014 which I do not have copies.


As Compliance Officer of Softrock, Inc., you have repeatedly use the word “urls” attributing these “urls” to me without educating the Court as to the difference between “urls”  and”  website addresses (domains).” What you and your client seek to have the Court hold me accountable for are web addresses/domains most of which are entirely not mine and a handful of 4 domains which have postings/urls the Court order removed. Those postings/urls have since been removed. The Court have already ruled on those postings/urls. 


I again have reach out to you and requesting that you provide me with all documents submitted to the Court.
Your cooperation would be greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,

Archie Garga-Richardson |PO Box 10294 |Glendale, CA 91209| 

On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Thomas Sadaka <tom@sadakalaw.com> wrote:
We have differing “recollections” of the last hearing.  Regardless, this hearing is based upon URLs that are attributed directly to you.  They are on sites that you own and control.  I do not play games.  If you are willing to remove the postings than so say, otherwise we will leave it to the Judge to decide.
I have provided you with the operative pleading which is the Amended Motion for Order (amended as to exhibit numbers) and the attached exhibits.  The references to the exemplified documents were for a certified copy of the final judgment that will be used to levy on your Trademarks and your domain names.  You are already in possession of the Final Judgment.


From: scamFRAUDalert < scamfraudalert@gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, March 4, 2015 at 10:05 PM
To: Thomas Sadaka < tom@sadakalaw.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Non-Delivery of Motion To Show Cause

Mr. Sadaka:
Thank you for providing me with a copy of the Motion for Order filed 11/14/15. The copy  motion emailed me is incomplete.  At our last hearing on April 30, 2013 where I was represented by Counsel, there appears to be discrepancies between documents send me and those submitted to the Court. To ensure that these documents are the same, I would appreciate and like to have from you a stamped copy of documents filed with the Court.
I have not received copies of the following documents filed per the Court docket.10/10/2014 – Correspondence: re Exemp FJ10/14/2014 –  Exemplified Certificate Issued & sent to Judge11/14/2014 – Amended Motion for Order11/14/2014 – Amended Motion for Order  Second02/19/2015 – All Exhibits In Support of Order To Show Cause
My recollection of our last hearing, not sure if date was April 30 or June 10, 2013 is as follows:

  1. Judge Rand Willis denied  Motion For Contempt/Enforcement on grounds that Plaintiffs could not substantiate the urls/postings presented to the Court were that of (Defendant).
  2. Plaintiffs “witness” admitted in Court he was totally unaware that urls presented to the Courts were “”fraudulent” since the urls/postings were complied and supplied to Counsel by Plaintiffs employee. Plaintiffs witness also admitted that he was unaware that postings online can easily be copied and easilyre-post where about online.
  3. You also stated that postings on “Ripoffreport” not attributed to the Defendant could not be remove since Ripoffreport have a policy of non removal of posts.
  4. You also asked the Court for mercy if the Court would entertained and facilitate assisting Plaintiffs in removing all urls/postings online relating to your client by issuing an Court Order attributing  urls/postings to Defendant provided both Plaintiffs and Defendant agreed to go along.
  5. Judge Willis agreed and said he would signed such agreement if both parties could fashion some sort of agreement aiding in the removal of urls/postings online not attributed to the Defendant for which your client seek removal.
  6. Defendant position is not to assist or aid in any removal of urls/postings online relating to your client since he is not responsible for those urls/postings. That  your client business practices have resulted in these postings. 
  7. You did not present to the Court any evidence which showed  posting of those urls /domain names belong to the Defendant or were made by the Defendant. 
  8. Your client attempted to seek an Contempt of Court proceeding in California by way of the Debtor/Creditor examination hearing again by filing “fraudulent” documents was denied. The Glendale California rejected such filings comfortable to Judge Rand Willis of the Ninth Judicial Circuit.

The issued of urls/postings and domain names on the internet which you are seeking the aids of the Court from removal by the Defendant have been ruled upon both in Florida and California. 
Please tell me if my recollection of events is differ from what you understand Judge Willis ruling to be.
Your cooperation would be greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,
Archie Garga-Richardson /scamFRAUDalert
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Thomas Sadaka <tom@sadakalaw.com> wrote:

Mr. Garga-Richardson,

Thank you for your email and your request to “Please provide me with copies and the offending urls so that I can comply to the Court order.”  Please provide me a list of all sites that you have published information about Alec Difrawi, Edward Bell, and all companies you have attributed to Alec on your various web-sites.  With confirmation of the posts and their removal, we can ask the Court to withdraw the Order to Show Cause.

As you know from our last hearing, all the Plaintiff’s are seeking is your compliance with the Final Judgment and Orders that have been entered in this case.

Sincerely,

Thomas A. Sadaka, LL.M.

Sadaka Law Group, PLC
1701 Park Center Drive
Orlando, FL 32835
407-278-5728

Sadaka Law Group, PLC
1420 Celebration Blvd, Suite 200
Celebration, FL 34747
407-566-2110

——— Forwarded message ———-
From: scamFRAUDalert <scamfraudalert@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:02 AM
Subject: Non-Delivery of Motion To Show Cause
To: Thomas Sadaka < tom@nejamelaw.com>

NeJame, LaFay, Jancha, Ahmed, Barker, Joshi & Moreno, P.A.189 South Orange Avenue , Suite 1800Orlando, FL 32801Phone: 407-245-1232
Fax: 407-245-2980
tom@nejamelaw.com

Attention: Thomas Sadaka
Dear Mr. Sadaka:
It has come to my attention that Circuit Court Judge Kest has issued an order requesting my appearance before the Court on March 13, 2015 on what I believe is a Motion to Show Cause. To date, I have not received a copy of your Motion or a copy of the Judge Kest ordered.
Please provide me with copies and the offending urls so that I can comply to the Court order.
Your cooperation would be greatly appreciated.

Respectfully,

Archie Garga-Richardson

PO Box 10294Glendale, CA 91209

Attorney Myra P. Nicholson Offered Representing Alec Difrawi aka Gigats aka Expand, Inc. aka EducationMatch.com

from: Myra Nicholson – myra@mnicholson-law.com
to: ScamFraudAlert scamfraudalert@gmail.com
date: Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 7:50 AM
Subject: Potential Settlement
Important mainly because of the people in the conversation.
hide details 7:50 AM (16 minutes ago)


Good morning Mr. Garga-Richardson –

I hope you and I can finally resolve this issue to be mutually agreeable to both parties and to help consumers. Just to outline the direction I would like to see (we can go over details if everyone is comfortable with the general premise).

My client would

  1. Agree to post information prominently on the site that the site is advertising based and many offers on the site (if accepted would lead to communication from advertisers)*
  2. Agree to hire you as a consumer advocate consultant and work with you to constantly improve the experience for the users. Our standard rate for outside consultants is $85/hour
  3. Address any complaints from users you have received and work to satisfy the users concerns.
  4. Drop all current litigation against you or any of your companies.

You would

  1. Remove negative information from sites and posts you have control over.
  2. Agree not to post additional negative allegations or information so long as my client is complying with terms of our agreement.
  3. Work with my client in helping them insure their user process is transparent and beneficial to consumers and users.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Regards,

Myra Nicholson

https://casetext.com/brief/career-network-inc-et-al-v-wot-services-ltd-et-al_motion-to-substitute-party-defendants-and-to-file-amended-complaint


From: ScamFraudAlert [mailto:scamfraudalert@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 6:48 AM
To: Myra Nicholson
Subject: Fwd: CSI Inquiry – 41169 [ttid: 1006,48597]

Dear Ms. Nicholson:

Thank you for responding to my emails. As the Court have instructed us to seek mediation which is require by Florida Law, I am looking forward to working with your client to put in PLACE a system where your client and I can exchange emails as I have been communicating with careerbuilder.com and monster.com. A copy of my communication with careerbuilder is forwarded below.

As I have said along, ScamFraudAlert.com position is as follows:

However, this is a starting point to reach some resolutions.

  • That your client put in place measures that would protect and safeguard job seekers against misrepresentation and deceptive advertising.
  • That a disclaimer be put on all web pages which your client advertise on that inform job seekers the position he/she is about to apply for is an advertisement for career education training. Such disclaimer be visible and not hidden.
  • That all job seeker be given the option to opt out of any career education training solicitations.
  • This is our position and we hold this steadfast. Monitoring of your client business practices online is on going due to the nature of the work we do at ScamFraudAlert.com.

We are open to listen to your proposals.

Thank you for your time and I look forward to working with you.

Cordially,

Owner, scamFRAUDalert
Consumer Protection | Cyber-crime Awareness

_______________________________________________________________________________________

FYI…. Careerbuilder never initiated any lawsuit against scamFRAUDalert or any bloggers. Instead, careerbuilder and other job search board listen to what consumers were complaining about and implemented safe guards to protect job seekers.

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Site Integrity SiteIntegrity@careerbuilder.com
Date: Tue, May 23, 2006 at 1:32 PM
Subject: CSI Inquiry – 41169 [ttid: 1006,48597]
To: TTRecorder TTRecorder@careerbuilder.com, ScamFraudAlert scamfraudalert@gmail.com

Dear Archie,

Thank you for contacting Careerbuilder.com. We appreciate you sending us this information. We are dedicated to removing fraudulent companies from our website and we rely on the help of our customers to do so.

At this time, we have removed the jobs posted by T-T-T Inc from our site and are currently working to ensure that this company will not have the ability to use any of the products and services on our website. In appropriate cases, we will also share information with the FBI, Secret Service, and local law enforcement agencies across the country to further combat this type of fraudulent activity.

Thanks for your help! If you have any additional questions or comments, please let us know. We are available by email at csi@careerbuilder.com or by phone at 1-866-438-1485, 8:00 am to 9:00 pm EST, Monday through Friday.

Heather Blythe / Site Integrity Team

CareerBuilder.com I The Smarter Way to Find a Better Candidate!

866.438.1485 I Customer Service
http://www.ic3.gov | FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center

Learn how to better protect yourself online! Learn about common scams and how to avoid becoming a victim on CareerBuilder’s Fighting

WhoIs liveinhomecare.com? aka trafficplanethosting.com

To Whom This May Concern:

My name is Archie Garga-Richardson and I own the trademark scam FRAUD alert.  I am contacting you regarding an article which includes the words scam /fraud alert. Link is below:
https://uspto.report/TM/90723980
https://www.liveinhomecare.com/elderly-scam-fraud-alert-june-2021/fraud-scams/

Please remove the word SCAM FRAUD ALERT from your article and all other articles you have written or published on behalf of your clients or yourself as these articles include the words scam FRAUD alert infringe on my trademark. If you are a content creator, please cease and desist from using scam fraud alerts in any shape or form in any of your publications on any platforms you own, operate or are affiliated with.

Should you disregard this request, I will have no choice but to take LEGAL actions against ALL publications you are affiliated with, including the domain registrar and host for trademark infringements.

Your cooperation would be greatly appreciated.

Owner, scamFRAUDalert

_______________________________________________________________________________________

Address lookup
canonical name:https://liveinhomecare.com

aliases
addresses:194.1.147.85
194.1.147.70
Domain Whois record
Queried whois.internic.net with “dom liveinhomecare.com”…

Domain Name: LIVEINHOMECARE.COM
Registry Domain ID: 18751001_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com
Updated Date: 2021-01-26T18:47:23Z
Creation Date: 2000-01-31T13:30:13Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2026-01-31T13:30:13Z
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 146
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@godaddy.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: 480-624-2505
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited


Name Server: NS40.WPXHOSTING.COM
Name Server: NS41.WPXHOSTING.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned

URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
Last update of whois database: 2021-08-01T22:29:43Z <<<
Queried whois.godaddy.com with “liveinhomecare.com”…

Domain Name: liveinhomecare.com
Registry Domain ID: 18751001_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com
Updated Date: 2021-01-26T11:47:22Z
Creation Date: 2000-01-31T08:30:13Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2026-01-31T08:30:13Z
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 146
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@godaddy.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4806242505
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Registrant Organization:
Registrant State/Province: Connecticut
Registrant Country: US
Registrant Email: Select Contact Domain Holder link at https://www.godaddy.com/whois/results.aspx?domain=liveinhomecare.com

Tech Email: Select Contact Domain Holder link at https://www.godaddy.com/whois/results.aspx?domain=liveinhomecare.com
Admin Email: Select Contact Domain Holder link at https://www.godaddy.com/whois/results.aspx?domain=liveinhomecare.com


Name Server: NS40.WPXHOSTING.COM
Name Server: NS41.WPXHOSTING.COM

DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/
Last update of WHOIS database: 2021-08-01T22:29:59Z

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/epp-status-codes-2014-06-16-en

Information related to ‘194.1.147.0 – 194.1.147.255’
Abuse contact for ‘194.1.147.0 – 194.1.147.255’ is ‘abuse@wpxhosting.com’

inetnum: 194.1.147.0 – 194.1.147.255
netname: K-MEDIA-TECH
country: BG
org: ORG-WH23-RIPE
admin-c: AT14758-RIPE
tech-c: AT14758-RIPE
geoloc: 41.881832 -87.623177
status: ASSIGNED PI
mnt-by: RIPE-NCC-END-MNT
mnt-by: WPXHOSTING-MNT
mnt-routes: WPXHOSTING-MNT
mnt-domains: WPXHOSTING-MNT
created: 2007-02-09T14:44:55Z
last-modified: 2018-10-11T09:15:59Z
source: RIPE
sponsoring-org: ORG-NCSI1-RIPE

organisation: ORG-WH23-RIPE
org-name: K Media Tech Ltd.
org-type: OTHER
address: Solunska 27, Sofia, Bulgaria
e-mail: ripe@wpxhosting.com
abuse-c: ACRO17053-RIPE
mnt-ref: WPXHOSTING-MNT
mnt-by: WPXHOSTING-MNT
created: 2018-06-13T14:41:04Z
last-modified: 2018-06-27T10:34:12Z
source: RIPE

person: Georgi Petrov
address: Solunska 27, Sofia, Bulgaria
phone: +359-898-540425
nic-hdl: AT14758-RIPE
mnt-by: WPXHOSTING-MNT
created: 2018-06-13T14:22:32Z
last-modified: 2018-06-27T10:35:00Z
source: RIPE

% Information related to ‘194.1.147.0/24AS210250’

route: 194.1.147.0/24
origin: AS210250
mnt-by: WPXHOSTING-MNT
created: 2018-10-08T12:56:43Z
last-modified: 2018-10-08T12:56:43Z
source: RIPE

This query was served by the RIPE Database Query Service version 1.101 (HEREFORD)
DNS records
name class type data time to live
http://www.liveinhomecare.com IN A 194.1.147.85 600s (00:10:00)
http://www.liveinhomecare.com IN A 194.1.147.70 600s (00:10:00)
liveinhomecare.com IN A 194.1.147.85 600s (00:10:00)
liveinhomecare.com IN A 194.1.147.70 600s (00:10:00)
liveinhomecare.com IN MX
preference: 5
exchange: mail.liveinhomecare.com
38400s (10:40:00)
liveinhomecare.com IN NS ns40.wpxhosting.com 38400s (10:40:00)
liveinhomecare.com IN NS ns41.wpxhosting.com 38400s (10:40:00)
liveinhomecare.com IN TXT v=spf1 a mx a:liveinhomecare.com ip4:67.202.92.17 ?all 38400s (10:40:00)
liveinhomecare.com IN SOA


server: ns40.wpxhosting.com
email: root@s17.wpxhosting.com
serial: 1560214169
refresh: 10800
retry: 3600
expire: 604800
minimum ttl: 38400
38400s (10:40:00)
85.147.1.194.in-addr.arpa IN PTR wpx.net 38400s (10:40:00)
147.1.194.in-addr.arpa IN NS ns1.wpxhosting.com 38400s (10:40:00)
147.1.194.in-addr.arpa IN NS ns2.wpxhosting.com 38400s (10:40:00)
147.1.194.in-addr.arpa IN SOA
server: ns1.wpxhosting.com
email: root@v1.trafficplanethosting.com
serial: 1612276993
refresh: 10800
retry: 3600
expire: 604800

_____________________________________________

Address lookup
canonical name:trafficplanethosting.com
aliases
addresses: 67.202.92.65
Domain Whois record
Queried whois.internic.net with “dom trafficplanethosting.com”…

Domain Name: TRAFFICPLANETHOSTING.COM
Registry Domain ID: 1813037476_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.namecheap.com
Registrar URL: http://www.namecheap.com
Updated Date: 2021-01-04T10:05:30Z
Creation Date: 2013-07-05T11:43:00Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2024-07-05T11:43:00Z
Registrar: NameCheap, Inc.
Registrar IANA ID: 1068
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@namecheap.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.6613102107
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited


Name Server: NS1.TRAFFICPLANETHOSTING.COM
Name Server: NS2.TRAFFICPLANETHOSTING.COM

DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/

Last update of whois database: 2021-08-01T22:51:04Z <<<
Queried whois.namecheap.com with “trafficplanethosting.com”…

Domain name: trafficplanethosting.com
Registry Domain ID: 1813037476_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.namecheap.com
Registrar URL: http://www.namecheap.com

Updated Date: 2021-01-04T10:05:30.91Z
Creation Date: 2013-07-05T11:43:00.00Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2024-07-05T11:43:00.00Z
Registrar: NAMECHEAP INC
Registrar IANA ID: 1068
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@namecheap.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.6613102107
Reseller: NAMECHEAP INC

Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID:
Registrant Name: Withheld for Privacy Purposes
Registrant Organization: Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Registrant Street: Kalkofnsvegur 2
Registrant City: Reykjavik
Registrant State/Province: Capital Region
Registrant Postal Code: 101
Registrant Country: IS
Registrant Phone: +354.4212434
Registrant Email: 4e54e462905a4052af5fbe85f8093bb6.protect@withheldforprivacy.com

Registry Admin ID:
Admin Name: Withheld for Privacy Purposes
Admin Organization: Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Admin Street: Kalkofnsvegur 2
Admin City: Reykjavik
Admin State/Province: Capital Region
Admin Postal Code: 101
Admin Country: IS
Admin Phone: +354.4212434
Admin Email: 4e54e462905a4052af5fbe85f8093bb6.protect@withheldforprivacy.com

Registry Tech ID:
Tech Name: Withheld for Privacy Purposes
Tech Organization: Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Tech Street: Kalkofnsvegur 2
Tech City: Reykjavik
Tech State/Province: Capital Region
Tech Postal Code: 101
Tech Country: IS
Tech Phone: +354.4212434
Tech Email: 4e54e462905a4052af5fbe85f8093bb6.protect@withheldforprivacy.com

Name Server: ns1.trafficplanethosting.com
Name Server: ns2.trafficplanethosting.com
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/

Last update of WHOIS database: 2021-08-01T13:51:18.31Z <<<
Network Whois record
Queried whois.arin.net with “n ! NET-67-202-92-0-1″…

NetRange: 67.202.92.0 – 67.202.92.255
CIDR: 67.202.92.0/24
NetName: TPH-1
NetHandle: NET-67-202-92-0-1
Parent: STEADFAST-3 (NET-67-202-64-0-1)
NetType: Reassigned
OriginAS: AS32748
Customer: Traffic Planet Hosting, LLC (C06169956)
RegDate: 2016-07-13
Updated: 2016-07-13
Ref: https://rdap.arin.net/registry/ip/67.202.92.0

CustName: Traffic Planet Hosting, LLC
Address: Solunska 27
City: Sofia
StateProv: SOFIA
PostalCode: 1000
Country: BG
RegDate: 2016-07-13
Updated: 2016-08-11
Ref: https://rdap.arin.net/registry/entity/C06169956

OrgTechHandle: NOG3-ARIN
OrgTechName: Steadfast Networks Network Operations Center
OrgTechPhone: +1-312-602-2689
OrgTechEmail: noc@steadfast.net
OrgTechRef: https://rdap.arin.net/registry/entity/NOG3-ARIN

OrgAbuseHandle: ABUSE959-ARIN
OrgAbuseName: Steadfast Networks Abuse Department
OrgAbusePhone: +1-312-602-2688
OrgAbuseEmail: abuse@steadfast.net
OrgAbuseRef: https://rdap.arin.net/registry/entity/ABUSE959-ARIN

OrgNOCHandle: NOG3-ARIN
OrgNOCName: Steadfast Networks Network Operations Center
OrgNOCPhone: +1-312-602-2689
OrgNOCEmail: noc@steadfast.net
OrgNOCRef: https://rdap.arin.net/registry/entity/NOG3-ARIN
DNS records
name class type data time to live
trafficplanethosting.com IN A 67.202.92.65 38400s (10:40:00)
trafficplanethosting.com IN MX
preference: 5
exchange: mail.trafficplanethosting.com
38400s (10:40:00)


trafficplanethosting.com IN NS ns1.trafficplanethosting.com 38400s (10:40:00)
trafficplanethosting.com IN NS ns2.trafficplanethosting.com 38400s (10:40:00)


trafficplanethosting.com IN TXT v=spf1 a mx a:trafficplanethosting.com ip4:67.202.92.66 ~all 38400s (10:40:00)
trafficplanethosting.com IN SOA
server: ns1.trafficplanethosting.com
email: root@v1.trafficplanethosting.com
serial: 1425548026
refresh: 10800
retry: 3600
expire: 604800
minimum ttl: 38400
38400s (10:40:00)
65.92.202.67.in-addr.arpa IN PTR v1.trafficplanethosting.com 86400s (1.00:00:00)
92.202.67.in-addr.arpa IN SOA

server: r0.steadfastdns.net
email: root@steadfast.net


serial: 2021070700
refresh: 14400
retry: 7200
expire: 3600000
minimum ttl: 86400
86400s (1.00:00:00)
92.202.67.in-addr.arpa IN NS ra.steadfastdns.net 86400s (1.00:00:00)
92.202.67.in-addr.arpa IN NS rb.steadfastdns.net

Cybercriminal Alec Difrawi – LinkedIn Page

https://www.linkedin.com/in/alecdifrawi

Experience

  1. Missing – Cybercriminal Gigats .com
  2. QuarterbackMoxie MediaMar 2004 – Present16 years 5 monthsOrlando, Fla.
  3. PresidentDifrawi Consulting2003 – 20041 yearGreater New York City Area
  4. International DirectorWilhelmina International1999 – 20034 yearsOrlando, Florida Area
  5. Marketing ConsultantDifrawi Consulting1991 – 19998 years

WhoIs ReputationManagementExperts.com

These so called reputation management websites are somehow in cahoots with the people search scamalert2websites and in most cases many are own and operated by mugshot operators.

  1. defendexperts.com
  2. reputationmanagementexperts.com
  3. defend-experts.com
  4. defendexperts.com
  5. postingreviews.com
  6. deletenegativereviews.com
  7. reputationrepairservices.com
  8. reviewmanagement.com
  9. postinggoodreviews.com
  10. postreveiws.net
  11. postpostivereviews.com
  12. dominatereviews.com
  13. crushyourcompetition.com
  14. postpositivereviews.com
  15. repairyourimage.com
  16. thereviewcaseresearchllc.org
  17. thereviewcaseresearchllc.com
  18. thereviewcaseresearchllc.net
  19. sleepmartreview.com
  20. reviewreputationcompanies.com
  21. reputatonreview.com
  22. deletenegativereviews.org
  23. deletebadreviews.org
  24. removenegativereviews.org
  25. deletenegativereviews.net
  26. removenegativereviews.net
  27. deletebadreviews.net
  28. deletebadreviews.com
  29. deletenegativereviews.com
  30. wepostgoodreviews.org
  31. wpostgoodreviews.com
  32. wepostgoodreviews.com
  33. postgoodreviews.org
  34. postgoodreviews.net
  35. postingreviews.com
  36. postingreviews.net
  37. postreviews.net
  38. postreviews.org
  39. postingreviews.org
  40. reviewposting.org
  41. removebadreviews.org
  42. removebadreviews.net
  43. reviewexperts.org
  44. removereviews.org
  45. reviewposters.com
  46. deletereviews.com
  47. removenegativereviews.com
  48. removereviewwebsites.com
  49. removereviewsites.com
  50. removeinternetreviews.com
  51. removeonlinereviews.com
  52. removereviews.com
  53. reputationreviews.com

AS133618 (TRELLIAN-AS-AP- 103.224.212.222) – Direct Search Network –

The Cyber Security group MalwareURL.com whose slogan is FIGHTING MALWARE AND CYBER CRIMINALITY have identified 109 domains associated with malware distribution directly link to Fraud Alert2Trellian Direct Search Network

Partial listing can be found below.

  1. zemeisonline.net
  2. 4.z23td9r.ipeejretireby40.net
  3. eewoochelsea-fc.org
  4. eegooitusersmagazine.net
  5. 461.hsnf.yahwikoepota.net
  6. thonhoan.com

Malware_url.png

WhoIs GuaranteedRemoval.com and InternetReputation.com?

According to the complaint filed by REFLEX MEDIA, INC., GuaranteedRemoval.com and InternetReputation.com are owned by one ARMAN ALI, of Rajshahi, Bangladesh. This we are not certain.

GuaranteedRemoval
interputation.png

The Better Business Bureau says both of these so-called companies are based in the USA. InternetReputation.com is base in Greenwood Village, Colorado and GuaranteedRemoval.com is based in Sarasota, Florida. Sarasota, Florida is of concern to us (SFA) because that’s where Kelly Joe Ellis company supposedly resides.

InternetReputation.com
7100 E Belleview Ave Ste 310
Greenwood Vlg, CO 80111-1639
http://www.internetreputation.com
(800) 758-9012

Business Details
Location of This Business
7100 E Belleview Ave Ste 310, Greenwood Vlg, CO 80111-1639

BBB File Opened: 4/13/2012
Years in Business: 8
Business Started: 1/20/2011
Business Started Locally: 1/20/2011
Business Incorporated: 1/20/2011 in CO
Accredited Since: 12/14/2016
Type of Entity: Limited Liability Company (LLC)
Number of Employees: 26
Alternate Business Name
Marca Global, LLC
Internet Reputation
Business Management
Ms. Melissa Talcott, Registered Agent
Contact Information
Principal : Ms. Melissa Talcott, Registered Agent

bbb_internetreputation

GuaranteedRemoval.com
2170 Main St STE 303
Sarasota, FL 34237-6040

Home


(786) 332-6395

Location of This Business
2170 Main St STE 303, Sarasota, FL 34237-6040

BBB File Opened: 1/9/2018
Contact Information
Principal
Mr. Bryan Powers, Other Contacts
Mr. Steve Thompson, Director
Additional Contact Information
Phone Numbers
(833) 873-0360
(786) 363-8515

BBB_GuaranteedRemoval.png

WhoIs ExpertRemovals.com ~ Predatoralerts.co ~ Predatoralerts.com

In following the the links as to who hacked (reputationarea.com) our site, we have stumble upon the sites expertremovals.com, predatoralerts.co and predatoralerts.com
ReputationArea2

The challenge with researching these guys is that the result always center around a web of individuals acting in cohorts or independently. There business practices are the same and there methods leave so many footprints making it so difficult to filter out the TRUE culprit. They are all interrelated.

The Whois for expertremovals.com is private. No surprises here. They claimed to be the expert removals of negative posts or comments about you or your firm online. The sites listed on their sites are:

  1. Complaintsboard.com
  2. Ripoffreport.com
  3. The Dirty
  4. PissedConsumer.com
  5. DirtyScam
  6. She’s A Home Wrecker (They were identified in google search of SFA sites)
  7. uascomoplaints.cm

ExpertRemovals2

We we google and bing search expertremovals.com, Predatorsalerts.co appeared. So we then googled Predatoralsert.com and found out that it is for sale and was once owned by a Howard E. Ryan who was sued by 3M Company.

predatoralerts_com.png

3M Company v. Ryan

United States District Court, D. New JerseyJun 6, 2007
CIVIL NO. 05-5732 (SRC) (D.N.J. Jun. 6, 2007)

ORDER
STANLEY CHESLER, District Judge

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the motion by Plaintiff, 3M Company (“Plaintiff” or “3M”), to enforce the terms of a settlement (docket #12) reached between it and Defendants Howard E. Ryan and Custom Browser, Inc. (“Defendants”); and this Court having referred this matter to Magistrate Judge Arleo, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); and

IT APPEARING that, on December 21, 2006, Magistrate Judge Arleo heard oral argument on the motion; and it further

APPEARING that, on April 24, 2007, Magistrate Judge Arleo issued a Report and Recommendation (“R R”) (docket #29) on this matter, pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), L. CIV. R. 72.1(a)(2), and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), recommending that the motion to enforce settlement be granted as expressed in the Consent Judgment and Settlement Agreement prepared by the Court; and it further

APPEARING that on May 10, 2007, Magistrate Judge Arleo issued an Amended R R (docket #32) and a Modified Consent Judgment and Settlement Agreement; and it further

APPEARING that a magistrate judge’s recommended disposition of a dispositive matter is subject to de novo review, In re U.S. Healthcare, 159 F.3d 142, 145-46 (3d Cir. 1998); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); and it further APPEARING that no objections to the R R have been filed; and it further

APPEARING that this Court has reviewed the R R under the appropriate de novo standard, and agrees with Magistrate Judge Arleo’s analysis and conclusions; and for good cause appearing;

IT IS, THEREFORE, on this 6th day of June, 2007,

ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Arleo’s Amended R R (docket #32) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that final judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants in accordance with the terms of the Consent Judgment and Settlement Agreement, as annexed hereto.

CONSENT JUDGMENT AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
THIS MATTER having come before the Court on March 6, 2006, for a settlement conference, and Arnold B. Calmann, Esq. of Saiber, Schlesinger, Satz Goldstein, having appeared on behalf of Plaintiff, 3M Company (“plaintiff”), along with Hildy Bowbeer, plaintiff’s Assistant Chief of Intellectual Property Counsel, and Defendant, Howard E. Ryan, having appeared pro se and on behalf of defendant Custom Browser, Inc. (“defendants”), and each of the parties having a full and fair opportunity to be heard, and by consent of plaintiff and defendants, it is hereby Ordered, Adjudged, and Decreed, that the following terms, which were placed on the record, will become part of this Consent Judgment and Settlement Agreement:

A. STIPULATIONS AND AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES

1. Defendants admits to the fame and validity of the “3M” Mark as well as 3M’s exclusive ownership of the Mark;
2. Defendants acknowledge that they made misrepresentations about the 3M respirators and that such misrepresentations was inconsistent with the instructions, limitations and warnings contained in the User Instructions accompanying 3M brand respirator products and that they infringed the 3M Mark;
3. Defendants will take no action, or encourage others, to assist anyone else with infringing, or violating the terms of this Consent Judgment and Settlement Agreement;
4. The corrective press release that this Court had approved previously and that was disseminated to the public is incorporated herein and attached hereto as Exhibit 1;
5. The Temporary restraints and injunction against defendants set forth in the Temporary Retraining Order entered in this action on December 9, 2005 are made permanent by this Consent Judgment and Settlement Agreement, as set forth in section B, below, and will bind defendants Ryan and Custom Browser, including the various websites that Ryan has control over either personally or through Custom Browser;
7. Ryan admits that the list of the websites contained in the corrective press release and listed on Schedule “A” annexed hereto is a complete list of all of the websites that he owns or otherwise controls;
8. Any future disputes relating to the 3M Mark or to this Consent Judgment will be litigated in the District of New Jersey;
9. Defendants will indemnify plaintiff against any third-party claims arising from any misstatements or misrepresentations that were contained on the websites strictly related to the 3M brand respirator products in issue; and
10. If not otherwise covered by the indemnification provision of this Consent Judgment, in the event a third-party files suit against plaintiff for claims arising from the misrepresentations or misstatements that were contained on the websites strictly related to the 3M brand respirator products in issue, in a venue other than the District of New Jersey, plaintiff reserves the right to bring defendants into that lawsuit and assert those claims plaintiff deems appropriate.

B. ORDERS AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

The defendants, their officers, directors, employees, principals, agents, representatives, subsidiaries, affiliates, partners, successors and assigns, and any other corporate organization, business entity, Internet domain name and website, and/or person under the possession, custody and/or control of defendants, and all those persons aiding, abetting or acting in concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Consent Judgment and Settlement Agreement by personal service or otherwise, including in connection with the domain names and websites listed on Schedule “A” annexed hereto and made part of this Consent Judgement and Settlement Agreement, shall be permanently restrained and enjoined, jointly and severally:
1. From selling, making, using, advertising, marketing, promoting, displaying and/or distributing any communication that creates a false or misleading impression, representation and/or statement regarding 3M brand respirator products, in connection with the suggestion or implication of guaranteed protection against contracting communicable disease, condition or health ailment whatsoever;
2. From registering, using, maintaining, owning, creating, managing, controlling, and/or participating in any domain name and/or website that contains or implies any health claim or any other type of claim that is false or misleading or creates a false impression with respect to any aspect of any 3M brand respirator or any respirator product sold under the 3M Mark;
3. From directly or indirectly adopting, using, registering, or seeking to register any trademark, service mark or other type of mark, company, business or domain name, or other name, that would cause a likelihood of confusion with, tarnish, dilute, cause blurring, lessen the significance or value of, or otherwise infringe the 3M trademark. Included within the meanings of a likelihood of confusion and infringement would be any mark or name that would cause a false or misleading association, connection, sponsorship, or affiliation with or endorsement by the 3M Company;
4. From selling, using and/or otherwise adopting any counterfeit reproduction, copy, or colorable imitation of the 3M Mark;
5. From misusing, advertising, marketing, promoting, distributing and/or misrepresenting the 3M trademark in any matter or manner whatsoever, including in connection with any advertisement, marketing, promotion, sales and/or distribution, as well as in connection with any domain name, company name, business name or other name, or any use whatsoever in connection with the Internet (e.g., any metatag, key line or source code);
6. From making any statement or representation whatsoever that falsely designates 3M as the origin of the defendants’ products or services or is otherwise false or misleading with respect to 3M and/or the 3M Mark;
7. From doing any act or thing likely to confuse, mislead or deceive others into believing that defendants, and/or their products or services, emanate from or that defendants themselves are connected with, sponsored by, endorsed by, or approved by, or otherwise affiliated with plaintiff 3M;
8. From playing, utilizing, advertising, marketing, displaying, promoting, or otherwise using in whole or in part the audio file that was presented on the website “3mmasks.com,” on any domain name and website contained in Schedule “A”, or on any other websites, now and in the future, that are operated, owned, managed, and/or controlled by either of the defendants and/or any other corporate organization or business entity or person under the possession, custody and/or control of either or both of defendants, and defendants are enjoined from transferring said audio file and any duplicate or part thereof to any other person for public use in any manner;
9. From playing, utilizing, advertising, marketing, displaying, promoting, or otherwise using in whole or in part the Windows Media File (i.e., video) of defendant Ryan’s CNBC interview that was presented on the website “3mmasks.com,” on any domain name and website contained in Schedule “A”, or on any other websites, now and in the future, that the defendants operate, own, manage, and/or control, and any other corporate organization or business entity or person under the possession, custody and/or control of either or both of defendants, and defendants are enjoined from transferring said Windows Media File and any duplicate or part thereof to any other person for public use in any manner;
10. From misrepresenting, deceiving, defrauding, implying, and/or creating the misimpression to the public in any manner whatsoever that any genuine 3M brand products are to be used, capable of being used, recommended, approved and/or are qualified for use for anything other than the specific and delineated uses set forth in the User Instructions accompanying that 3M brand respirator product presently in effect, and/or as may become effective in the future, or those uses specified for a particular use by a regulatory agency such as the Center For Disease Control (“CDC”), or the World Health Organization (“WHO”);
11. From selling, offering to sell, advertising, marketing, promoting and/or distributing 3M brand respirator products based on any statements or representations, directly or indirectly, that said products can or may be used, or are recommended, approved or qualified for any use other than the specific and delineated uses set forth in the User Instructions accompanying that 3M product presently in effect, and/or as may become effective in the future, or those uses specified for a particular use by a regulatory agency such as the CDC or WHO;
12. No resurrection from any archived source, from any domain name or website, now and in the future, including those websites in Schedule “A” annexed hereto, of the infringing and/or misrepresentative content; and
13. Secreting, destroying, removing or otherwise hindering or preventing the timely production of documents, electronic data and tangible evidence relating to the Defendants’ business activities and/or which are in any way relevant to the allegations contained in the Verified Complaint.
It is further Ordered that subject to the terms of this Consent Judgment and Settlement Agreement, this matter is concluded by entry of this Consent Judgment and Settlement Agreement and any and all claims that were, or could have been, asserted in the lawsuit against defendants are hereby dismissed with prejudice in accordance with the terms of this Consent Judgment and Settlement Agreement as it relates to defendants, with the Court to retain jurisdiction over the parties for purposes of enforcing this Consent Judgment and Settlement Agreement.

Further Ordered that plaintiff releases any and all pending or potential claims against defendants arising under federal and/or state statutory or common law as they pertain to the subject matter of this lawsuit, except as otherwise expressly stated herein.

Both parties waive their right to appeal the final adjudication of this lawsuit as between plaintiff and defendants by entry of this Consent Judgment and Settlement Agreement. However, the parties do not waive the right to appeal any future action, decision, or adjudications by this or any Court with respect to the enforcement, interpretation, or application of the provisions of this Consent Judgment and Settlement Agreement.

It is Ordered this ___ day of May, 2007

The parties hereby agree to the terms of the Settlement Agreement set forth here in Pro Se

For The Plaintiff, 3M Company ________________________________________
DATED: ______________________________
Hildy Bowbeer Assistant Chief of Intellectual Property Counsel ________________________________________
DATED: Arnold Callman, Esq. Saiber, Schlesinger, Satz Goldstein, P.C.

The Defendants, Howard E. Ryan and Custom Browser, Inc. ________________________________________
DATED: Howard E. Ryan,

SCHEDULE A
Incorporated in the foregoing Consent Judgment and Settlement Agreement are the following domain names and websites:

  1. libraryfilter.com
  2. predatoralerts.com
  3. pandemicflu.com
  4. webgramming.org
  5. custombrowser.com
  6. njplumbersunite.com
  7. customerbrowser.net
  8. customerbrowser.biz
  9. chathamcellphone.com
  10. desktopalert.com
  11. smogmasks.com
  12. customexplorer.com
  13. custombrowser.us
  14. livetherapyonline.org
  15. jessicacutler.net
  16. customalerts.com
  17. customalert.com
  18. customdeskbar.com
  19. customexplorerbar.com
  20. companiontoolbar.com
  21. desktopalerts.net
  22. visprecis.com
  23. thefamilybrowser.com
  24. cloneaide.com
  25. customtoolbar.com
  26. custombrowser.info
  27. singlesalert.net
  28. singlesalerts.net
  29. ieblocker.com
  30. birdflumasks.us
  31. respirators.us
  32. familymedicalsupplies.com

We also uncovered that Predatoralerts.co also exist and offering its services
predatoralerts_co

Don’t know if these individuals are related or are in cahoots but here is a lawsuit brought by REFLEX MEDIA, INC., a Nevada Ccorporation

REFLEX MEDIA, INC., a Nevada
Corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
DOE NO. 1, an individual d/b/a http://www.PredatorsAlerts.com; DOE NO.
2, an individual d/b/a http://www.PredatorExposed.com; ARMAN ALI, an individual d/b/a/ D4 SOLUTIONS BD; MARCA GLOBAL, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company d/b/a http://www.InternetReputation.com; WEB PRESENCE, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company d/b/a http://www.NetReputation.com, http://www.GuaranteedRemoval.com, and http://www.ReputationLawyers.com; and DOES 3-50, inclusive,

REFLEX MEDIA, INC., a Nevada
corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
DOE NO. 1, an individual d/b/a http://www.PredatorsAlerts.com; DOE NO.
2, an individual d/b/a http://www.PredatorExposed.com; ARMAN
ALI, an individual ( Arman Ali is an individual residing in Rajshahi, Bangladesh,) d/b/a D4 SOLUTIONS BD; MARCA GLOBAL, LLC, a Colorado limited
liability company d/b/a http://www.InternetReputation.com; WEB PRESENCE, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company d/b/a http://www.NetReputation.com, http://www.GuaranteedRemoval.com, and http://www.ReputationLawyers.com; and
DOES 3-50, inclusive,

Albert Ahdoot dba Colocation America and Scott Breitenstein dba Predatorswatch.com Have Frequent Our Sites the Most

A review of the search terms on SFA sites indexed by google revealed that Albert Ahdoot dba Colocation America of Los Angeles and Scott Breitenstein dba Predatorwatch.com of Dayton, Ohio including operators of the sites beenverified.com, instantcheckmate.com, and 123people.com have pay the most scamFRAUDalert SFA sites.

We are aware that our sites have been hacked and have all reasons to believe that these two individuals  are somehow involved. Nevertheless, we intend on bring them to justice.

Below are the searched terms listings.

  1. mgmforex
  2. http://www.123people.com
  3. 123people usa
  4. remove reviewstalk.com reviews
  5. colocation america corporation
  6. remove scamgroup posts
  7. badboyreport
  8. instant checkmate wiki
  9. remove & delete a shesahomewrecker.com post
  10. ripe net whois
  11. cheaterland removal
  12. data center colocation company orlando
  13. instantcheckmate com reviews
  14. instantcheckmate.com reviews
  15. lombard dui attorney
  16. contract dispute lawyer arlington heights
  17. instantcheckmate.com reviews
  18. one wilshire colocation
  19. ripe ip address lookup
  20. remove information from beenverified
  21. how to remove my information from beenverified
  22. how to remove information from beenverified
  23. colocation los angeles
  24. beenverified
  25. 123people.com usa
  26. craigslist.ocom
  27. next layer telekommunikationsdienstleistungs – und beratungs gmbh
  28. scamadviser wiki
  29. site scamadviser
  30. webhostingtalk offers
  31. complaintboard.in
  32. cloudflare.com abuse
  33. notice of ceasing to act family court
  34. wipo udrp
  35. what is cheaterland
  36. shesahomewrecker ohio
  37. whois.arin.net
  38. whois.arin.net
  39. remove scamfraudalert posts
  40. cheatersrus
  41. repdigger removal
  42. lbduk
  43. liarscheatersandbastards removal
  44. complaintsboard.com
  45. rxfourm
  46. todd ulrich wftv
  47. craigslist.ocom
  48. badboyreport
  49. scott breitenstein dayton ohio
  50. ara inc collection agency
  51. predatorswatch
  52. kidslivesafe scam
  53. 350 e cermak rd chicago il 60616
  54. area code 530 scams
  55. colocation tahiti
  56. goodwill marina del rey
  57. 123people
  58. code postal 86400
  59. dui attorney clifton nj
  60. lv wilshire pm
  61. ripe ip whois
  62. http://www.complaintsboard.com
  63. cheaterland website
  64. ripe whois lookup

WhoIS profiledefenders.com aka Scott Allen Breitenstein of Dayton, Ohio

profiledDefender2.png
Sites Where we Can Remove Complaints

 ReputationArea3

cybercriminal.png

Have a complaint online that is false? Is it hurting you or your business? Well no longer do you need to worry as we can guarantee to remove any of the negative webpages from the websites listed below. This is a direct removal where the webpage will no longer be live on the website and we will also get the webpage removed from Google completely once we have it taken off of the website.
Please select the websites in which you need a removal from and send us an email through our contact form with the URL and information and we will reply back with a quote and time frame for the permanent removal.

BBB_Report
Location of This Business
29 Bidleman Street
Dayton, OH 45410-1917

BBB File Opened:7/25/2012
Alternate Business Name
Hide My Domains, LLC
Complaints Bureau
exposeascam.com

Contact Information
Principal
Mr. Scott Allen Breitenstein, Owner
Additional Contact Information
Website Addresses
http://www.complaintsbureau.com
http://www.exposeascam.com
(937) 660-7343
Location of This Business
29 Bidleman Street
Dayton, OH 45410-1917

BBB File Opened:7/25/2012
Alternate Business Name
Hide My Domains, LLC
Complaints Bureau
exposeascam.com

Contact Information
Principal
Mr. Scott Allen Breitenstein, Owner
Additional Contact Information
Website Addresses
http://www.complaintsbureau.com
http://www.exposeascam.com
(937) 660-7343

  1. outscam.com/
  2. usacomplaints.com/
  3. complaintboard.com/
  4. complaintsboard.com
  5. incomplaint.com/
  6. Reviewstalk.com
  7. ripoffreport.com/
  8. LiarscheatersRus.com
  9. ReportMyEx.com
  10. ComplaintsBureau.com
  11. DatingScams101
  12. DeadBeatDirectory
  13. BadBoyreport.kr
  14. DatingPsychos.com
  15. Playerblock.com
  16. badboyreport.kr
  17. badboyreports.com
  18. badbusinessrus.com
  19. badgirlreports.com
  20. blacklist-report.com
  21. cheatercollege.com
  22. cheaterland.com
  23. cheaterregistry.com
  24. cheaterreport.com
  25. cheaterreports.com
  26. cheaterscatcher.com
  27. cheatersrus.com
  28. cheatingspouses.net
  29. datingcomplaints.com
  30. datingnightmare.com
  31. datingpsychos.com
  32. datingscams101.com
  33. deadbeatdirectory.com
  34. expose-homewreckers.com
  35. exposing-cheaters.com
  36. filthylittlesecrets.com
  37. flushthejohns.com
  38. hesawomanizer.com
  39. houseofliars.com
  40. ihatedeadbeats.com
  41. liarscheatersandbastards.com
  42. liarscheatersrus.com
  43. losadulteros.com
  44. pervertreport.com
  45. playerblock.com
  46. predatorswatch.com
  47. reportdeadbeats.com
  48. reportmyex.com
  49. shesahomewrecker.com
  50. stabbedmeintheback.com
  51. stdregistry.com
  52. stdregistry.org
  53. thedirty.com
  54. badbizforum.com
  55. badbizreport.com
  56. blacklistreport.com
  57. citysearch.com
  58. complaints.com
  59. complaintboard.com
  60. complaintsbureau.com
  61. exposeascam.com
  62. rate-my-agent.com
  63. realtorcomplaints.com
  64. scamboard.com
  65. scamfound.com
  66. scaminformer.com
  67. usacomplaints.com
  68. stdcarriersdatabase.com

WhoIs reputationarea.com?

ReputationArea2
ReputationArea3
ReputationArea.png

SFA Reporter
Sep 20, 2014·scamFRAUDalert.com
User Info
Name: Terry Martin
Email: terry@reputationarea.com
Website:
Comment: Attention Marketing Department

We are reaching you to alert you to a recent Ripoff Report filed against your business. Whether the report is accurate or not, if we easily found the below report in Google’s search results, you can bet you’re losing new customers because of it:
Archie Garga Richardson, Archie Richardson, Garga Richardson Archie Richardson aka ScamFraudAlert aka Archie Garga Richardson Glendale Internet

http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Archie-Garga-Richardson/internet/Archie-Garga-Richardson-Archie-Richardson-Garga-Richardson-Archie-Richardson-aka-ScamFr-1176250

This complaint was filed against your business on 9/12/2014.

We’re Reputation Experts and we help companies like yours repair their damaged online reputation. Please let us know
your phone number , so we can explain how we can help you overcome this business development hurdle.

Thank you,
Terry Martin, Reputation Expert
ReputationArea.com

PREDATORSWATCH.COM – LINKEDIN INVITATION ~ DIANE WATERS

predatorswatch

scamFRAUDalert see it appropriate to ALERT online visitors to Fraud Alert2the domain scamfraudalert.org. The domain expired and we forgot to renew it. The domain is currently in the hands of a cybercriminal. DO NOT CLICK the LINK associated with the domain name scamFRAUDalert.org for NOW.

The criminals HAVE hacked our sites and have been harvesting posts. We intend on getting .org back.

Below are the POSTS that are being harvested with REDIRECTS:

  1. Sedo.com: scamfraudalert.org is available for purchase
  2. extortion scam – LinkedIn Invitation ~ Diane Waters
  3. scamfraudalert.org/2013/03/08/economic-frauds-www-.
  4. mugshots extortions – LinkedIn Invitation ~ Diane Waters
  5. scamfraudalert.org/2013/11/25/linkedin-invitation-.
  6. Popular Facebook Scams – LinkedIn Invitation ~ Diane Waters
  7. scamFRAUDalert Digest – scamfraudalert.org
  8. scamfraudalert . org
  9. wikiwarnings.com – LinkedIn Invitation ~ Diane Waters
  10. unethical – LinkedIn Invitation ~ Diane Waters
  11. scamfraudalert.org/category/scam-alert
  12. extortion scheme – LinkedIn Invitation ~ Diane Waters
  13. public record harvester – scamfraudalert.org › category › public-alert › public-record-harvester
  14. WhoIs ~ globalpharmacyintl.com – LinkedIn Invitation ~ Diane Waters
    scamfraudalert.org › 2013/11/22 › whois-globalpharmacyintl-com

site_camfraudalertorg 1site_camfraudalertorg 2

UnAuthorized Firms – Fake Companies Operating in the UK

The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) have listed these firms or individuals as scamalertsuspicious and are unauthorized to conduct business in the UK.

Calibre Cars trading name of Autotech Kent Car Sales (Cranbrook) Ltd -08/08/2019
Profit Trading Ltd (clone of UK registered company) – 06/08/2019
Thomas and Ward Advisors LLC – 06/08/2019
Smith & Williams PLC trading as Smith and Williams Online (clone of authorised firm) – 06/08/2019
Amanh Bank (clone of authorised firm) – 05/08/2019
BC Profit (clone of authorised firm) – 02/08/2019
TBFX Limited (clone of FCA authorised firm) – 02/08/2019
Complete Protection Cover Ltd – 02/08/2019
Cheap Insurance Broker – 02/08/2019
B1 Insurance – 02/08/2019
Mariusz Juszcayk – 02/08/2019
VPM Vermogensverwaltungs AG (clone of FCA authorised firm) – 02/08/2019
DQN Capital (clone of FCA authorised firm) – 02/08/2019
Tribely (clone of FCA authorised firm) – 02/08/2019
Wise Capital UK (clone of authorised firm) – 01/08/2019
LIB Group Asset Management – 31/07/2019
Atlantic Equities LLP (clone of authorised firm) – 31/07/2019
Dang Kang International Group Limited (clone of authorised firm) – 31/07/2019
StockotradeFX \ Ultimatecryptofx \ Tradevibefx (clone) – 30/07/2019
Hartmead Finance Limited (clone of FCA authorised firm) – 30/07/2019
Windsor Manor – 30/07/2019
Pension Cash Now – 30/07/2019
British Capital Investments – 29/07/2019
Trading Investments Group – 29/07/2019
First Chartered Investments -29/07/2019