WhoIs Ticketmagic.com

scamFRAUDalert see it appropriate to issue this ALERT as there are reports online that suggest the site is not trustworthy. The WhoIs information below shows that site may be own by the domain holder https://sellsomeproperty.com (pmaldonado@sellsomeproperty.com)however, the WhoIs for sellsomeproperty.com is privately protected i.e. unknown.

The BBB and other news outlets online have reported that fraudulent schemes have been purported by the site operator. BBB further say the business is no longer in service and yet the site is up and running. The site list a reach number:

Reach out to us any time at +1 (844) 425-4548 or via email at support @ ticketmagic.com.

-www-ticketmagic-com

Ticket Magic
440 North Main Street #A
East Longmeadow, MA 01028-1805


ticketmagic
is ticket magic reliable
tickets review
ticketmagic refund
ticket magic safe
ticket magic promo code
fake metallica tickets
ticketmagic fees
toronto tickets review
is ticketmaster legit
is ticketmagic safe
ticketmagic review
is ticket magic legitimate
ticketmagic legit
is ticket magic reliable
ticketmagic reviews
is ticket magic a legit site
is ticketmagic real


Address lookup
canonical name :ticketmagic.com
aliases
addresses:69.89.31.187
Domain Whois record

Queried whois.internic.net with “dom ticketmagic.com”…

Domain Name: TICKETMAGIC.COM
Registry Domain ID: 84895036_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.networksolutions.com
Registrar URL: http://networksolutions.com
Updated Date: 2017-01-25T09:16:19Z
Creation Date: 2002-03-26T20:26:42Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2018-03-26T19:26:42Z
Registrar: Network Solutions, LLC.
Registrar IANA ID: 2
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@web.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.8003337680
Domain Status: ok https://icann.org/epp#ok
Name Server: NS1.BLUEHOST.COM
Name Server: NS2.BLUEHOST.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2017-08-08T16:05:00Z Last update of WHOIS database: 2017-08-08T16:05:13Z <<<
Network Whois record

Queried rwhois.unifiedlayer.com with "69.89.31.187"…

%rwhois V-1.5:000080:00 rwhois.unifiedlayer.com (by Unified Layer, V-1.0.0)
Queried whois.arin.net with "n 69.89.31.187"…

NetRange: 69.89.16.0 – 69.89.31.255
CIDR: 69.89.16.0/20
NetName: UNIFIEDLAYER-NETWORK-1
NetHandle: NET-69-89-16-0-1
Parent: NET69 (NET-69-0-0-0-0)
NetType: Direct Allocation
OriginAS: AS46606
Organization: Unified Layer (BLUEH-2)
RegDate: 2006-10-02
Updated: 2012-11-14
Ref: https://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-69-89-16-0-1

OrgName: Unified Layer
OrgId: BLUEH-2
Address: 1958 South 950 East
City: Provo
StateProv: UT
PostalCode: 84606
Country: US
RegDate: 2006-08-08
Updated: 2017-07-31
Ref: https://whois.arin.net/rest/org/BLUEH-2

ReferralServer: rwhois://rwhois.unifiedlayer.com:4321

OrgAbuseHandle: ABUSE3581-ARIN
OrgAbuseName: Abuse Department
OrgAbusePhone: +1-888-401-4678
OrgAbuseEmail: abuse@unifiedlayer.com
OrgAbuseRef: https://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/ABUSE3581-ARIN

OrgNOCHandle: NETWO5508-ARIN
OrgNOCName: Network Operations
OrgNOCPhone: +1-888-401-4678
OrgNOCEmail: netops@unifiedlayer.com
OrgNOCRef: https://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/NETWO5508-ARIN

OrgTechHandle: NETWO5508-ARIN
OrgTechName: Network Operations
OrgTechPhone: +1-888-401-4678
OrgTechEmail: netops@unifiedlayer.com
OrgTechRef: https://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/NETWO5508-ARIN

RTechHandle: NETWO2081-ARIN
RTechName: Network Operations
RTechPhone: +1-801-765-9400
RTechEmail: netops@bluehost.com
RTechRef: https://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/NETWO2081-ARIN

RNOCHandle: TECHN497-ARIN
RNOCName: Technical Operations
RNOCPhone: +1-801-765-9400
RNOCEmail: support@bluehost.com
RNOCRef: https://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/TECHN497-ARIN

RAbuseHandle: NOC2320-ARIN
RAbuseName: Network Operations Center
RAbusePhone: +1-801-765-9400
RAbuseEmail: abuse@bluehost.com
RAbuseRef: https://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/NOC2320-ARIN

name class type data time to live
ticketmagic.com IN NS ns2.bluehost.com 84521s (23:28:41)
ticketmagic.com IN NS ns1.bluehost.com 84521s (23:28:41)
187.31.89.69.in-addr.arpa IN PTR box387.bluehost.com 86400s (1.00:00:00)
31.89.69.in-addr.arpa IN NS ns1.unifiedlayer.com 86400s (1.00:00:00)
31.89.69.in-addr.arpa IN NS ns2.unifiedlayer.com 86400s (1.00:00:00)
31.89.69.in-addr.arpa IN SOA
server: ns1.unifiedlayer.com
email: abuse@unifiedlayer.com
serial: 2017011000
refresh: 28800
retry: 14400
expire: 3600000
minimum ttl: 300
86400s (1.00:00:00)
— end —
URL for this output | return to CentralOps.net, a service of Hexillion

FTC Files Charges Against Independent Sales Organization and Sales Agents

Defendants Laundered Transactions for ‘Money Now Funding’ Scheme

The Federal Trade Commission has charged 12 defendants with laundering millions of dollars in credit card charges through fraudulent merchant accounts. According to the complaint filed by the FTC, the defendants arranged for a deceptive operation known as Money Now Funding (MNF) to obtain and maintain merchant accounts that allowed it to process almost $6 million through the credit card networks.

In September 2013, the FTC charged MNF with running a deceptive business opportunity scheme that promised consumers they would make thousands of dollars helping small businesses get loans. The court in the MNF matter determined that MNF’s promises were false.

Today’s case alleges that the defendants – an Independent Sales Organization (ISO), sales agents, and their principals – provided the MNF scheme access to the credit card networks  by submitting and approving fraudulent applications in the names of more than 40 fictitious MNF companies. According to the FTC’s complaint, the defendants did so despite obvious signs that the companies were likely fictitious and being used to conceal the true identity of the underlying merchant. By processing the fraudulent MNF scheme’s transactions through merchant accounts opened in the names of fictitious companies, the ISO defendants allegedly also evaded the anti-fraud monitoring efforts of the credit card networks.

In the case announced today, the defendants are charged with violating the FTC Act and the FTC’s Telemarketing Sales Rule.

The ISO defendants are Electronic Payment Systems LLC, Electronic Payment Transfer LLC, John Dorsey, Thomas McCann and Michael Peterson. The sales agent defendants are Electronic Payment Solutions of America Inc., Electronic Payment Services Inc., KMA Merchant Services LLC, Dynasty Merchants LLC, Jay Wigdore, Michael Abdelmesseh, also known as Michael Stewart, and Nikolas Mihilli.

The Commission vote authorizing the staff to file the complaint was 2-0. It was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona.

NOTE: The Commission files a complaint when it has “reason to believe” that the law has been or is being violated and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. The case will be decided by the court.

The Federal Trade Commission works to promote competition, and protect and educate consumers. You can learn more about consumer topics and file a consumer complaint online or by calling 1-877-FTC-HELP (382-4357). Like the FTC on Facebook(link is external), follow us on Twitter(link is external), read our blogs and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.

 

FTC Charges Online Marketing Scheme with Deceiving Shoppers

One-time “trial” offer for tooth whitener led to recurring $200 monthly charges

The Federal Trade Commission has charged an online marketing operation with deceptively luring people into an expensive negative option scam using an initial low-cost ($1.03, plus shipping and handling) “trial” offer for tooth whiteners and other products.

A federal court temporarily halted the operation and froze its assets at the request of the FTC, which seeks to end the practices.

According to the FTC, the defendants used a network of 78 companies, at least 87 websites, and dozens of bank accounts to hide their ownership and launder the profits from the scheme. They also drove people to their websites via affiliate networks that generate web traffic with blog posts, banner ads and surveys. For example, some consumers got emails inviting them to fill out surveys falsely claiming to be for well-known merchants such as Kohl’s and Amazon, and were directed to the defendants’ websites to claim a “reward” for completing the survey.

The FTC alleges that, using deceptive claims, hidden fine-print disclosures and confusing terms, the defendants tricked consumers into providing their billing information, and then started charging them about $100 a month unless consumers canceled within 8 days. They also used an order confirmation page to trick consumers into signing up for a second monthly subscription, which cost an additional $100, for an identical product. Because of this double-deception, the defendants charged consumers, who reasonably believed they had agreed to a single shipment for $1.03 plus shipping costs, about $200 a month until they canceled both unauthorized subscriptions.

The defendants are charged with violating the FTC Act and the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act.

The defendants are Blair McNea, Danielle Foss, Jennifer Johnson, Boulder Creek Internet Solutions Inc., Walnut Street Marketing Inc., and these LLCs: Anasazi Management Partners, RevMountain, Wave Rock, Juniper Solutions, Jasper Woods, Wheeler Peak Marketing, ROIRunner, Cherry Blitz, Flat Iron Avenue, Absolutely Working, Three Lakes, Bridge Ford, How and Why, Spruce River, TrimXT, Elation White, IvoryPro, Doing What’s Possible, RevGuard, RevLive!, Blue Rocket Brands, Convertis, Convertis Marketing, Turtle Mountains, Boulder Black Diamond, Mint House, Thunder Avenue, University & Folsom, Snow Sale, Brand Force, Wild Farms, Salamonie River, Indigo Systems, Night Watch Group, Newport Crossing, Greenville Creek, Brookville Lane, Honey Lake, Condor Canyon, Brass Triangle, Solid Ice, Sandstone Beach, Desert Gecko, Blizzardwhite, Action Pro White, First Class Whitening, Spark Whitening, Titanwhite, Dental Pro At Home, Smile Pro Direct, Circle of Youth Skincare, DermaGlam, Sedona Beauty Secrets, Bella at Home, SkinnyIQ, Body Tropical, and RoadRunner B2C LLC, also doing business as RevGo.

The Commission vote authorizing the staff to file the complaint was 2-0. The U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada entered a temporary restraining order against the defendants on July 25, 2017.

NOTE: The Commission files a complaint when it has “reason to believe” that the law has been or is being violated and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. The case will be decided by the court.

The Federal Trade Commission works to promote competition, and protect and educate consumers. You can learn more about consumer topics and file a consumer complaint online or by calling 1-877-FTC-HELP (382-4357). Like the FTC on Facebook(link is external), follow us on Twitter(link is external), read our blogs and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.

CONTACT INFORMATION

MEDIA CONTACT:
Frank Dorman(link sends e-mail)
Office of Public Affairs
202-326-2674

STAFF CONTACT:
Sarah Waldrop
Bureau of Consumer Protection
202-326-3444