www.besttimewin.com

scamFRAUDalert see it appropriate to issue this ALERT as consumers are complaining consumer alertabout unauthorized debits and credit charges.

Contact Information:
La Gyde 146
Fasanvænget
Kokkedal

Website:http://www.besttimewin.com

Regional 17428, Estação de Briançon, 2011.07.24

Regional 17428, Estação de Briançon, 2011.07.24 (Photo credit: nmorao)


Phone:+45-4540112433
support@besttimewin.com
simon@gonetwork.eu

WhoIs contestnotifications.net

Address lookup
canonical name contestnotifications.net scamalert
aliases
addresses 62.116.143.11
Domain Whois record

 

Queried whois.internic.net with “dom contestnotifications.net”…

 

Domain Name: CONTESTNOTIFICATIONS.NET
Registrar: INTERNET.BS CORP.
Whois Server: whois.internet.bs
Referral URL: http://www.internet.bs

 

Domain Name Extensions

Domain Name Extensions (Photo credit: The Booklight)

 
Name Server: NS1.PARKINGCREW.NET
Name Server: NS2.PARKINGCREW.NET
Status: clientTransferProhibited
Updated Date: 19-dec-2012
Creation Date: 24-oct-2012
Expiration Date: 24-oct-2013

 

>>> Last update of whois database: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 15:49:19 UTC <<<

 

Queried whois.internet.bs with “contestnotifications.net”…

 

Domain contestnotifications.net

 

Date Registered: 2012-10-24
Date Modified: 2012-12-19
Expiry Date: 2013-10-24

 

DNS1: ns1.parkingcrew.net
DNS2: ns2.parkingcrew.net

 

Registrant
Suspended by Registrar
Suspended Domain
Email:suspended.domain@topdns.com
98 Hampshire Street
Suspended domain
4892 Nassau
Bahamas
Tel: +1.23456789

 

Administrative Contact
Suspended by Registrar
Suspended Domain
Email:suspended.domain@topdns.com
98 Hampshire Street
Suspended domain
4892 Nassau
Bahamas
Tel: +1.23456789

 

Technical Contact
Suspended by Registrar
Suspended Domain
Email:suspended.domain@topdns.com
98 Hampshire Street
Suspended domain
4892 Nassau
Bahamas
Tel: +1.23456789

 

Registrar: Internet.bs Corp.
Registrar’s Website : http://www.internetbs.net/

 

Network Whois record

 

Queried whois.ripe.net with “-B 62.116.143.11″…

 

% Information related to ‘62.116.143.0 – 62.116.143.255’

 

inetnum: 62.116.143.0 – 62.116.143.255
netname: PARKINGCREW-NET
descr: Team Internet GmbH
descr: Lindwurmstr. 25
descr: 80337 / Muenchen
descr: Germany
country: DE
remarks: —————————————
remarks: Please send all Abuse, Spam, Scans and
remarks: Illegal Activity complaints to:
remarks: abuse@teaminternet.de
remarks: —————————————
admin-c: MW5092-RIPE
tech-c: MW5092-RIPE
status: ASSIGNED PA
notify: ripe@internetx.de
mnt-by: IX1-MNT
mnt-lower: IX1-MNT
mnt-routes: IX1-MNT
changed: ripe@internetx.de 20120323
source: RIPE

 

person: Mario Witte
address: Team Internet AG
address: Lindwurmstr. 25
address: 80337 / Muenchen
address: Germany
phone: +49-89-416146-010
fax-no: +49-89-416146-090
nic-hdl: MW5092-RIPE
notify: ripe@internetx.de
notify: ip@teaminternet.de
source: RIPE
mnt-by: IX1-MNT
changed: ripe@internetx.de 20120820

 

% Information related to ‘62.116.128.0/19AS15456’

 

route: 62.116.128.0/19
descr: INTERNETX-MUC-2
origin: AS15456
mnt-by: IX1-MNT
notify: ripe@internetx.de
changed: ripe@internetx.de 20080429
source: RIPE

 

% This query was served by the RIPE Database Query Service version 1.55 (WHOIS1)

 

DNS records

 

DNS query for 11.143.116.62.in-addr.arpa returned an error from the server: NameError
name class type data time to live
contestnotifications.net IN SOA
server: ns1.parkingcrew.net
email: hostmaster@parkingcrew.com
serial: 13620665
refresh: 28800
retry: 7200
expire: 604800
minimum ttl: 86400
10800s (03:00:00)
contestnotifications.net IN A 62.116.143.11 600s (00:10:00)
contestnotifications.net IN NS ns1.parkingcrew.net 3600s (01:00:00)
contestnotifications.net IN NS ns2.parkingcrew.net 3600s (01:00:00)

 

— end —

 

WhoIs ~ medfright.com and verifiedprocessor.com

Drug Enforcement Agency

United States of America


The Ryan Haight Act Known as
Online Pharmacy Consumer Protection Act of 2008
Sec. 2. Requirement of a valid prescription for
controlled substances dispensed by means of the Internet.

SUMMARY: The Ryan Haight Online Pharmacy Consumer Protection Act,
which was enacted on October 15, 2008,amended the Controlled Substances Act and Controlled Substances Import and Export Act by adding several new provisions to prevent the illegal distribution and dispensing of controlled substances by means of the Internet.



Address lookup
canonical name http://medfright.com

aliases
addresses 84.22.106.161
Domain Whois record

Queried whois.internic.net with “dom medfright.com”…

Domain Name: MEDFRIGHT.COM
Registrar: PSI-USA, INC. DBA DOMAIN ROBOT
Whois Server: whois.psi-usa.info
Referral URL: http://www.psi-usa.info
Name Server: NS1.MEDFRIGHT.COM
Name Server: NS2.MEDFRIGHT.COM
Status: clientTransferProhibited
Updated Date: 28-feb-2013
Creation Date: 15-feb-2013
Expiration Date: 15-feb-2014

>>> Last update of whois database: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 08:33:51 UTC <<<

Queried whois.psi-usa.info with "medfright.com"…

%
% =============
% PSI-USA, Inc.
% =============
%
% This is the PSI-USA, Inc. WHOIS server.
%
% All requests are logged.
%
% Requesting IP: 63.134.201.240
% Requesting URL: http://whois.psi-usa.info
% Requesting Object: domain medfright.com
% Timestamp: 2013-02-28 09:34:18
%
% You can see the policy that you agree by submitting a query to this server:
% whois -h whois.psi-usa.info POLICY

domain: medfright.com
status: LOCK,TRANSFER-LOCK-60
owner-c: LULU-11892945
admin-c: LULU-11892945
tech-c: LULU-11892945
zone-c: LULU-11892945
nserver: ns1.medfright.com
nserver: ns2.medfright.com
created: 2013-02-15 23:09:19
expire: 2014-02-15 23:09:18 (registry time)
changed: 2013-02-28 07:25:39

[owner-c] handle: 11892945
[owner-c] type: PERSON
[owner-c] title:
[owner-c] fname: Miia
[owner-c] lname: Hietamies
[owner-c] org:
[owner-c] address: Hermiankatu 92
[owner-c] city: Aijanneva
[owner-c] pcode: 34910
[owner-c] country: FI
[owner-c] state: Aijanneva
[owner-c] phone: +358-04462-35554
[owner-c] fax: +358-04462-35554
[owner-c] email: brabantio@medfright.com
[owner-c] protection: B
[owner-c] updated: 2013-02-15 23:09:14

[admin-c] handle: 11892945
[admin-c] type: PERSON
[admin-c] title:
[admin-c] fname: Miia
[admin-c] lname: Hietamies
[admin-c] org:
[admin-c] address: Hermiankatu 92
[admin-c] city: Aijanneva
[admin-c] pcode: 34910
[admin-c] country: FI
[admin-c] state: Aijanneva
[admin-c] phone: +358-04462-35554
[admin-c] fax: +358-04462-35554
[admin-c] email: brabantio@medfright.com
[admin-c] protection: B
[admin-c] updated: 2013-02-15 23:09:14

[tech-c] handle: 11892945
[tech-c] type: PERSON
[tech-c] title:
[tech-c] fname: Miia
[tech-c] lname: Hietamies
[tech-c] org:
[tech-c] address: Hermiankatu 92
[tech-c] city: Aijanneva
[tech-c] pcode: 34910
[tech-c] country: FI
[tech-c] state: Aijanneva
[tech-c] phone: +358-04462-35554
[tech-c] fax: +358-04462-35554
[tech-c] email: brabantio@medfright.com
[tech-c] protection: B
[tech-c] updated: 2013-02-15 23:09:14

[zone-c] handle: 11892945
[zone-c] type: PERSON
[zone-c] title:
[zone-c] fname: Miia
[zone-c] lname: Hietamies
[zone-c] org:
[zone-c] address: Hermiankatu 92
[zone-c] city: Aijanneva
[zone-c] pcode: 34910
[zone-c] country: FI
[zone-c] state: Aijanneva
[zone-c] phone: +358-04462-35554
[zone-c] fax: +358-04462-35554
[zone-c] email: brabantio@medfright.com
[zone-c] protection: B
[zone-c] updated: 2013-02-15 23:09:14

Network Whois record

Queried whois.ripe.net with "-B 84.22.106.161"…

% Information related to '84.22.106.0 – 84.22.106.255'

inetnum: 84.22.106.0 – 84.22.106.255
netname: A84-22-106-0
descr: Republic CyberBunker National Network 106
admin-c: CBMT1-RIPE
tech-c: CBMT1-RIPE
country: AQ
status: ASSIGNED PA
mnt-by: MNT-CB3ROB
mnt-lower: MNT-CB3ROB
mnt-routes: MNT-CB3ROB
changed: hostmaster@ripe.net 20130115
source: RIPE

role: Ministery of Telecommunications
address: One CyberBunker Avenue
address: CB-31337
address: CyberBunker-1
address: Republic CyberBunker
mnt-by: MNT-CB3ROB
e-mail: nobody@cyberbunker.com
admin-c: CBMT1-RIPE
tech-c: CBMT1-RIPE
nic-hdl: CBMT1-RIPE
changed: nobody@cyberbunker.com 20121127
source: RIPE

% Information related to '84.22.96.0/19AS34109'

route: 84.22.96.0/19
descr: R84-22-96-0
origin: AS34109
mnt-by: MNT-CB3ROB
changed: hostmaster@cb3rob.net 20100330
source: RIPE

% This query was served by the RIPE Database Query Service version 1.53 (WHOIS2)

DNS records

DNS query for 161.106.22.84.in-addr.arpa failed: TimedOut
name class type data time to live
medfright.com IN SOA
server: ns1.medfright.com
email: admin@medfright.com
serial: 2009000000
refresh: 600
retry: 900
expire: 1209600
minimum ttl: 43200
600s (00:10:00)
medfright.com IN NS ns1.medfright.com 600s (00:10:00)
medfright.com IN NS ns2.medfright.com 600s (00:10:00)
medfright.com IN MX
preference: 10
exchange: mail.medfright.com
600s (00:10:00)
medfright.com IN A 84.22.106.161 600s (00:10:00)

— end —



Address lookup
canonical name verifiedprocessor.com

aliases
addresses 178.32.236.43
Domain Whois record

Queried whois.internic.net with “dom verifiedprocessor.com”…

Domain Name: VERIFIEDPROCESSOR.COM
Registrar: CJSC REGISTRAR R01
Whois Server: whois.r01.ru
Referral URL: http://r01.ru
Name Server: B1.VERIFIEDPROCESSOR.COM
Name Server: B2.VERIFIEDPROCESSOR.COM
Status: clientRenewProhibited
Status: clientTransferProhibited
Updated Date: 21-feb-2013
Creation Date: 09-nov-2012
Expiration Date: 09-nov-2013

Last update of whois database: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 08:36:09 UTC
Queried whois.r01.ru with “verifiedprocessor.com”…
Domain name: VERIFIEDPROCESSOR.COM

Status: clientTransferProhibited

NameServers:
b1.verifiedprocessor.com
b2.verifiedprocessor.com

Creation date: 09-11-2012
Expiration date: 09-11-2013

Registrant:
N/A
Privacy Protection (noreply@r01.ru)
For contacting domain registrant
please visit http://privacy.r01.ru
All Postal mails and correspondence will be ignored.
Moscow
Moscow,10001
RU
Tel. +7.495000000

Administrative Contact:
N/A
Privacy Protection (noreply@r01.ru)
For contacting domain registrant
please visit http://privacy.r01.ru
All Postal mails and correspondence will be ignored.
Moscow
Moscow,10001
RU
Tel. +7.495000000

Technical Contact:
N/A
Privacy Protection (noreply@r01.ru)
For contacting domain registrant
please visit http://privacy.r01.ru
All Postal mails and correspondence will be ignored.
Moscow
Moscow,10001
RU
Tel. +7.495000000

Billing Contact:
N/A
Privacy Protection (noreply@r01.ru)
For contacting domain registrant
please visit http://privacy.r01.ru
All Postal mails and correspondence will be ignored.
Moscow
Moscow,10001
RU
Tel. +7.495000000

Information provided by R01 registrar

Network Whois record

Queried whois.ripe.net with “-B 178.32.236.43″…
Information related to ‘178.32.236.40 – 178.32.236.43’

inetnum: 178.32.236.40 – 178.32.236.43
netname: LVPS-0212
country: GB
descr: LusoVPS Low Cost VPS
org: ORG-LA397-RIPE
admin-c: OTC14-RIPE
tech-c: OTC14-RIPE
status: ASSIGNED PA
mnt-by: OVH-MNT
changed: noc@ovh.net 20120706
source: RIPE

organisation: ORG-LA397-RIPE
org-name: LusoVPS
org-type: OTHER
address: Avenida CA Martins
e-mail: abuse@lusovps.com
abuse-mailbox: abuse@lusovps.com
descr: LusoVPS
phone: +351302000325
mnt-ref: OVH-MNT
mnt-by: OVH-MNT
changed: noc@ovh.net 20120326
source: RIPE

role: OVH UK Technical Contact
address: OVH Ltd
address: 3 Southwark street
address: LONDON SE1 1RQ
address: UK
e-mail: noc@ovh.net
admin-c: OK217-RIPE
tech-c: GM84-RIPE
nic-hdl: OTC14-RIPE
abuse-mailbox: abuse@ovh.net
notify: noc@ovh.net
mnt-by: OVH-MNT
changed: noc@ovh.net 20101105
source: RIPE

% Information related to ‘178.32.0.0/15AS16276’

route: 178.32.0.0/15
descr: OVH ISP
descr: Paris, France
origin: AS16276
notify: noc@ovh.net
mnt-by: OVH-MNT
changed: noc@ovh.net 20100119
source: RIPE

% This query was served by the RIPE Database Query Service version 1.53 (WHOIS4)

DNS records

DNS query for 43.236.32.178.in-addr.arpa returned an error from the server: NameError
name class type data time to live
verifiedprocessor.com IN A 178.32.236.43 60s (00:01:00)
verifiedprocessor.com IN NS b1.verifiedprocessor.com 172800s (2.00:00:00)
verifiedprocessor.com IN NS b2.verifiedprocessor.com 172800s (2.00:00:00)

— end —

Consumer Advocates Group Experts, LLC

For Release: 02/07/2013

Defendants in Alleged “Forensic Audit” Mortgage Scam Settle FTC Charges

Marketers Held Out Bogus Promise that They Could Help Consumers Avoid Foreclosure; Often Charged Thousands of Dollars

The defendants behind an operation that allegedly preyed on vulnerable homeowners have agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that they lured people into paying $1,995 or more by holding out bogus promises that they

Seal of the United States Federal Trade Commis...

Seal of the United States Federal Trade Commission. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

could help them avoid foreclosure and renegotiate their mortgages.

The FTC’s settlement order against the Los Angeles, California-based Consumer Advocates Group Experts, LLC, company owner Ryan Zimmerman, and two other related companies is part of the agency’s continuing crackdown on scams that target consumers in financial distress.  It bans the defendants from marketing any mortgage assistance relief or other debt relief products or services.  It also prohibits them from making misleading claims about any financial product or service, or any other type of product or service.

At the request of the FTC, a U.S. district court halted the operation pending trial in June 2012.  The FTC’s complaint charged the defendants with violating the FTC Act and the Mortgage Assistance Relief Services Rule, known as the MARS Rule, by deceptively telling consumers that they could renegotiate mortgages, making payments substantially more affordable; that they could use the “forensic audits” to negotiate with lenders; and that if they failed to do these things, they would provide a refund.  The complaint also charges the defendants with other MARS Rule violations, including collecting fees for mortgage foreclosure rescue and loan modification services before homeowners accept a written offer from their lender or servicer, and failing to make required disclosures.

The settlement also imposes a $3.5 million judgment, which reflects the full amount of consumer injury during the two years before the operation was shut down.  The judgment will be suspended due to the defendants’ inability to pay.  If it is later determined that the financial information the defendants provided to the FTC was false, the full amount of the judgment will become due.

According to the complaint, the defendants claimed on their website that “up to 95% of mortgages may be legally unenforceable due to defects like lost documents, improper notices, appraisal and/or predatory lending.”  Using this claim, they said the results of the “forensic audits” they provided would help consumers avoid foreclosure.  They also promised that consumers could obtain mortgage modifications with reduced interest rates and lower monthly mortgage payments.

The complaint alleges that consumers often did not receive loan modifications or reduced
payments, and often found out from their lenders that the defendants either contacted them and failed to follow up, or never contacted them at all.  The complaint also alleges that the defendants routinely failed to answer or return consumers’ telephone calls and emails seeking updates on their mortgage modifications, failed to provide refunds to consumers who requested them, and put consumers at risk of losing their homes and damaging their credit ratings. Consumers often learned too late that their houses were being foreclosed upon, according to the complaint.

In addition to Consumer Advocates Group Experts, LLC and Zimmerman, the complaint and settlement order name Paramount Asset Management Corporation and Advocates for Consumer Affairs Expert, LLC as defendants in this case.

The FTC has advice for consumers about mortgage modification and foreclosure rescue scams.  For more information see the website Your Home and the publication Forensic Loan Audits.

The Commission vote authorizing the staff to file the proposed consent agreement was 5-0, with Commissioner Joshua D. Wright participating.  The FTC filed the proposed consent agreement in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California January 23, 2013, and it was entered by the court on February 1, 2013.

NOTE:  This consent decree is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by the defendants that the law has been violated.  Consent decrees have the force of law when approved and signed by the District Court judge.

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 2,000 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s website provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.  Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.

MEDIA CONTACT:
Betsy Lordan
Office of Public Affairs

202-326-3707
 
STAFF CONTACT:
Mary T. Benfield,
FTC Northwest Region
206-220-4472

Joe Lipinsky
FTC Northwest Region
206-220-4473

FTC Returns More Than $685,000 to Victims of “Real Wealth” Scam

For Release: 02/27/2013

FTC Returns More Than $685,000 to Victims of “Real Wealth” Work-at-Home and Grant Scam

The Federal Trade Commission is mailing 50,365 refund checks totaling more than $685,000 to consumers who were victimized by a bogus work-at-home and grant scam.  As part of a February 2010 law enforcement crackdown, the FTC took action against Real Wealth and other schemes, alleging that they took advantage of the economic downturn to bilk vulnerable consumers by peddling various products that supposedly helped to generate income.

In an ongoing partnership with the AARP Foundation, the FTC will provide consumers receiving redress checks with contact information for the AARP Fraud Fighter Call Center.  The center staff provide guidance about ways to avoid scams and stay safe.

The FTC alleged that Real Wealth, Inc. and its owner, Lance Murkin, preyed on the elderly, the disabled, and other consumers nationwide with a deceptive direct-mail campaign that marketed and sold booklets supposedly explaining how to earn money by working from home or applying for government grants.

The court agreed with the FTC that these claims were false or unsubstantiated, in violation of the FTC Act, and granted the FTC’s motion for summary judgment against the defendants.

Each consumer will receive $13.63, or 68 percent of the average amount lost, which was $20.  The checks will be mailed by an administrator working for the FTC, and will expire 60 days after they are issued.  The FTC never requires consumers to pay money or provide information before refund checks can be cashed.  The FTC would like to thank AARP Legal Counsel for the Elderly for bringing Real Wealth to its attention.

Consumers with questions about the Real Wealth refund checks should call the refund administrator at 1-888-519-6918.  For general questions about the FTC’s redress program, visit www.FTC.gov/refunds.

Consumers should carefully evaluate claims about work-at-home offers.  For more information see:  Business Opportunity Scams.

To learn about current scams and ways to stay safe, contact the AARP Fraud Fighter Call Center toll free at 1-800-646-2283, or www.aarp.org/wa.  The call center has consumer education materials on a wide range of issues concerning fraud prevention and victim support.  In past years, the call center provided peer counseling services to more than 500,000 consumers around the country.                                                                                                                                   

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 2,000 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s website provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.  Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.

MEDIA CONTACT:
Betsy Lordan
Office of Public Affairs

202-326-3707
 
STAFF CONTACT:
Kelly Horne
Bureau of Consumer Protection
202-326-3031

FTC Top 10 Complaint Categories for 2012

For Release: 02/26/2013

Identity Theft Tops List for 13th Consecutive Year in Report of National Consumer Complaints

Identity theft is once more the top complaint received by the Federal Trade Commission, which has released its 2012 annual report of complaints. 2012 marks the first year in which the FTC received more than 2 million complaints overall, and 369,132, or 18 percent, were related to identity theft. Of those, more than 43 percent related to tax- or wage-related fraud.

The report gives national data, as well as a state-by-state accounting of top complaint categories and a listing of the metropolitan areas that generated the most complaints. This includes the top 50 metropolitan areas for both fraud complaints and identity theft complaints.

The remainder of complaint categories making up the top 10 are:

Number Percent
Debt collection 199,721 10 percent
Banks and Lenders 132,340 6 percent
Shop-at-Home and Catalog Sales 115,184 6 percent
Prizes, Sweepstakes and Lotteries 98,479 5 percent
Impostor Scams 82,896 4 percent
Internet Services 81,438 4 percent
Auto-Related Complaints 78,062 4 percent
Telephone and Mobile Services 76,783 4 percent
Credit Cards 51,550 3 percent

A complete list of all complaint categories is available on page six of the report.

The FTC enters complaints into the Consumer Sentinel Network, a secure online database that is available to more than 2,000 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies across the country. Agencies use the data to research cases, identify victims and track possible targets.

Other federal and state law enforcement agencies contribute to Consumer Sentinel, including the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Internet Crime Complaint Center and the offices of 14 state attorneys general. Private-sector organizations contributing data include all Better Business Bureaus in the U.S. and Canada, PrivacyStar, Publishers Clearing House and others.

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 2,000 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s website provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.  Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.

MEDIA CONTACT:
Jay Mayfield
Office of Public Affairs

202-326-2181
 
STAFF CONTACT:
David Torok
Bureau of Consumer Protection
202-326-3075

FTC Warns Veterans: Be Wary of ‘Free’ Pension Advice

 02/25/2013

The Federal Trade Commission warns veterans and their families:  Be wary of dishonest advisers offering “free” help with paperwork for pension claims.

Unscrupulous lawyers, financial planners and insurance agents advise veterans over 65 to transfer their assets to a trust, or to invest in insurance products, so they can qualify for Aid and Attendance benefits.  By following their advice, you could lose your eligibility for Medicaid services and the use of your money for a long time, plus get billed for fees that range from hundreds to thousands of dollars.

Whether it’s through an ad or a website, these offers usually involve a free seminar, often at assisted living facilities, senior centers, or other places in your community.  They may claim to be veterans themselves, and appeal to your emotions to get you to act.  Consider any pressure to act fast as your cue to say no.  Your best bet is to take your time, do some research, and consider all your options, including doing nothing.

To learn more, read the FTC’s Poaching Veterans’ Pensions.

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 2,000 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s website provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.  Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.

MEDIA CONTACT:
Office of Public Affairs
202-326-2180
 

HTC America Settles FTC Charges

For Release: 02/22/2013

 It Failed to Secure Millions of Mobile Devices Shipped to Consumers

Company Required to Patch Vulnerabilities on Smartphones and Tablets

Mobile device manufacturer HTC America has agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that the company failed to take reasonable steps to secure the software it developed for its smartphones and tablet computers, introducing security flaws that placed sensitive information about millions of consumers at risk.

The settlement requires HTC America to develop and release software patches to fix vulnerabilities found in millions of HTC devices. In addition, the settlement requires HTC America to establish a comprehensive security program designed to address security risks during the development of HTC devices and to undergo independent security assessments every other year for the next 20 years.

HTC America, Inc., a leading mobile device manufacturer in the United States, develops and manufactures mobile devices based on the Android, Windows Mobile, and Windows Phone operating systems. HTC America has customized the software on these devices in order to differentiate itself from competitors and to comply with the requirements of mobile network operators.

The Commission charged that HTC America failed to employ reasonable and appropriate security practices in the design and customization of the software on its mobile devices. Among other things, the complaint alleged that HTC America failed to provide its engineering staff with adequate security training, failed to review or test the software on its mobile devices for potential security vulnerabilities, failed to follow well-known and commonly accepted secure coding practices, and failed to establish a process for receiving and addressing vulnerability reports from third parties.

To illustrate the consequences of these alleged failures, the FTC’s complaint details several vulnerabilities found on HTC’s devices, including the insecure implementation of two logging applications – Carrier IQ and HTC Loggers – as well as programming flaws that would allow third-party applications to bypass Android’s permission-based security model.

Due to these vulnerabilities, the FTC charged, millions of HTC devices compromised sensitive device functionality, potentially permitting malicious applications to send text messages, record audio, and even install additional malware onto a consumer’s device, all without the user’s knowledge or consent. The FTC alleged that malware placed on consumers’ devices without their permission could be used to record and transmit information entered into or stored on the device, including, for example, financial account numbers and related access codes or medical information such as text messages received from healthcare providers and calendar entries concerning doctor’s appointments. In addition, malicious applications could exploit the vulnerabilities on HTC devices to gain unauthorized access to a variety of other sensitive information, such as the user’s geolocation information and the contents of the user’s text messages.

Moreover, the complaint alleged that the user manuals for HTC Android-based devices contained deceptive representations, and that the user interface for the company’s Tell HTC application was also deceptive. In both cases, the security vulnerabilities in HTC Android-based devices undermined consent mechanisms that would have otherwise prevented unauthorized access or transmission of sensitive information.

The settlement not only requires the establishment of a comprehensive security program, but also prohibits HTC America from making any false or misleading statements about the security and privacy of consumers’ data on HTC devices. HTC America and its network operator partners are also in the process of deploying the security patches required by the settlement to consumers’ devices. Many consumers have already received the required security updates. The FTC encourages consumers to apply the updates as soon as possible.

The settlement with HTC America is part of the FTC’s ongoing effort to ensure that companies secure the software and devices that they ship to consumers. Earlier this month, the FTC introduced Mobile App Developers: Start with Security, a new business guide that encourages app developers to aim for reasonable data security. In addition, on June 4, 2013, the Commission will host a public forum on malware and other mobile security threats in order to examine the security of existing and developing mobile technologies and the roles that various members of the mobile ecosystem can play in protecting consumers.

The Commission vote to accept the consent agreement package containing the proposed consent order for public comment was 3-0-2, with Chairman Jon Leibowitz not participating and Commissioner Maureen Ohlhausen recused. The FTC will publish a description of the consent agreement package in the Federal Register shortly. The agreement will be subject to public comment for 30 days, beginning today and continuing through March 22, after which the Commission will decide whether to make the proposed consent order final. Interested parties can submit comments electronically or in paper form by following the instructions in the “Invitation To Comment” part of the “Supplementary Information” section. Comments in paper form should be mailed or delivered to: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, Room H-113 (Annex D), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20580. The FTC is requesting that any comment filed in paper form near the end of the public comment period be sent by courier or overnight service, if possible, because U.S. postal mail in the Washington area and at the Commission is subject to delay due to heightened security precautions.

Twitter Chat
FTC staff will host a Twitter Chat today from 12-1 p.m. ET to answer questions about the HTC America settlement. Follow @FTC and tweet questions with the hashtag #FTCpriv.

NOTE: The Commission issues an administrative complaint when it has “reason to believe” that the law has been or is being violated, and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. The complaint is not a finding or ruling that the respondent has actually violated the law. A consent order is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by the respondent that the law has been violated. When the Commission issues a consent order on a final basis, it carries the force of law with respect to future actions. Each violation of such an order may result in a civil penalty of up to $16,000.

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 2,000 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s website provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.  Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.

MEDIA CONTACT:
Jay Mayfield
Office of Public Affairs

202-326-2181
 
STAFF CONTACT:
Nithan Sannappa
Bureau of Consumer Protection
202-326-3185
Jonathan E. Zimmerman
Bureau of Consumer Protection
202-326-2049

Robocaller Banned From Telemarketing in Settlement with FTC

For Release: 02/19/2013

The architect of an operation that allegedly distributed illegal robocalls offering credit card interest rate reduction programs, extended automobile warranties, and home security systems, is banned from telemarketing under a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission.

The FTC settlement against Roy M. Cox, Jr., is part of the FTC’s ongoing efforts to stop illegal robocalls.  In December 2011, the FTC charged Cox and several related companies with illegally failing to transmit their name or their clients’ names on consumers’ caller ID displays when making their telemarketing calls, using generic names instead, such as “CARD SERVICES,” “CREDIT SERVICES,” or “PRIVATE OFFICE.”  The FTC also alleged that they knew, or consciously avoided knowing, that they called phone numbers on the National Do Not Call Registry, and made pre-recorded sales calls to consumers without their written consent.

The settlement order bans Cox from telemarketing and imposes a $1.1 million civil penalty that will be suspended due to his inability to pay.  The full penalty will become due immediately if he is found to have misrepresented his financial condition.  The FTC and DOJ have asked the court to dismiss five of Cox’s co-defendants who could not be served or are defunct – Castle Rock Capital Management S.A., Capital Solutions Group S.A., Transfers Argentina S.A., Public Service, and Marketing Strategy Group – and will seek to have default entered against a sixth defendant.

The Commission vote to approve the proposed consent judgment was 3-0-2, with Commissioners Ohlhausen and Wright not participating.  The Department of Justice filed the proposed consent judgment on behalf of the Commission in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.  The Court entered the consent judgment on January 31, 2013.

NOTE:  This consent judgment is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by the defendant that the law has been violated.  Consent judgments have the force of law when approved and signed by the District Court judge.

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 2,000 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s website provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.  Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.

MEDIA CONTACT:
Frank Dorman,
Office of Public Affairs
202-326-2674
STAFF CONTACT:
James Davis,
FTC’s Midwest Region
312-960-5611

FTC Settlement Bans Telemarketers from Selling Healthcare-Related Products

For Release: 02/20/2013

Telemarketers Allegedly Bilked Millions of Dollars from Consumers Seeking Health Insurance

Telemarketers who allegedly tricked consumers into buying purported health insurance are permanently banned from selling healthcare-related products under a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission.  The case is part of the FTC’s ongoing efforts to crack down on fraudsters who prey on vulnerable consumers seeking health insurance, including the uninsured, the unemployed, and those with pre-existing medical conditions.

In September 2012, the FTC charged Roy D. Hamilton and his wife, Judy M. Hamilton, and their companies, Health Service Providers, Inc., Magnolia Health Management Corporation, Magnolia Technologies Corporation, and Fav Marketing Inc. (HSP defendants), with fraudulently selling bogus health insurance for the Independent Association of Businesses (IAB).  The HSP defendants allegedly called consumers who had submitted their contact information to websites that claimed to offer quotes for traditional health insurance or equivalent coverage.  According to the FTC, after paying an initial fee ranging from $50 to several hundred dollars and a monthly fee ranging from $40 to $1,000, consumers eventually learned they had not purchased comprehensive health insurance, but were deceived into buying an IAB membership that supposedly provided discounts on services such as golf, travel, and some limited health related services and insured benefits.

In addition to the ban against selling healthcare-related products, the settlement order prohibits the HSP defendants from misrepresenting material facts about any goods or services, selling or otherwise benefiting from consumers’ personal information, and from violating the FTC’s Telemarketing Sales Rule, including calling consumers on the Do Not Call Registry.  The order also imposes an $11.8 million judgment that has been suspended following the HSP defendants’ surrender of assets to the FTC.

Litigation continues against the remaining defendants behind the allegedly fraudulent health insurance scheme:  IAB Marketing Associates LP, Independent Association of Businesses, HealthCorp International Inc., JW Marketing Designs LLC, International Marketing Agencies, LP, International Marketing Management LLC, Wood LLC, James C. Wood, James J. Wood, Michael J. Wood, and Gary D. Wood.  The FTC has also sought to amend its complaint against the remaining defendants in the case, adding two individuals as relief defendants who allegedly benefitted from the scheme but did not participate in it.

The Commission vote approving the consent order and authorizing the staff to file the amended complaint was 4-0-1, with Chairman Leibowitz not participating.  The FTC filed its motion to amend the complaint on February 13, 2013, and the consent order was entered by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida on February 19, 2013.

NOTE:  The Commission files a complaint when it has “reason to believe” that the law has been or is being violated and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest.  The complaint is not a finding or ruling that the defendant has actually violated the law.  The consent order is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by the defendant that the law has been violated.  Consent orders have the force of law when approved and signed by the District Court judge.

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call
1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 2,000 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s website provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.  Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.

MEDIA CONTACT:
Frank Dorman
Office of Public Affairs

202-326-2674
 
STAFF CONTACT:
Dotan Weinman
Bureau of Consumer Protection
202-326-3049

Colocation America Ownership ~ UnitedLayer

The WhoIs registar does not provide the PUBLIC with the name of the owner. The physical address listed is a mail drop in Las Vegas, NV. The trademark application filed November 26, 2007 list Albert Ahdoot as CEO.

Colocation America and UnitedLayer Management Ownership

  • Arman Khalili is currently the Founder, CEO and co-owner.
  • Peter Preuss[8] – Director of Systems Architecture and co-owner
  • Otto Grajeda [9]- Founder and co-owner
  • Albert A. Ahdoot – [10]- co-owner

Colocation America is own and operated by one Albert Ahdoot aka Albert A. Ahdoot aImage representing UnitedLayer as depicted in ...professional spammer and his business partners at UnitedLayer. Albert Ahdoot at one time operated Net Global Marketing  a firm accused of running a SPAM operation by Earthlink.

According to his sleazeball  Attorney Paul S. Sigelman of Sigelman Law or Paul Sigelman Law Firm, Albert Ahdoot is not the owner filed with Godaddy, the domain registar. He has since rescinded his assertion that Albert Ahdoot is not the owner in other pleadings.

scamFRAUDalert hosting experienced with this individual dba Colocation America was nothing more than a complete disaster. Two bogus lawsuits were filed against scamFRAUDalert.

Albert Ahdoot also goes by Albert Arash Ahdoot. He is the Founder/CEO/OWNER of Colocation America Corporation. A registered Nevada Corporation with it’s primary place of business  Los Angeles, CA who lease  data spaces from the downtown data centers and across USA.

Mr. Ahdoot is a RESELLER of Colocation services as he lease rack space from Digital Realty Trust, Multacom.com, UnitedLayer, Above.com, Cogent Communication, Level 3 Communications and other ISP providers across continental USA and resells colocation spaces via his websites.

Legal Threats  – Letters

Mr. Ahdoot and his sleazeball Attorney actively seek to remove any negative comments posted online about Mr. Albert Ahdoot business practices and his company Colocation America Corporation.

The standard industry practice for e-commerce companies to silence critics  is  through the legal process, if unsuccessful, they deploy  other means such as spammingDdos attacks, issuing bogus daily press releases or just outright smear campaigns.

Since encountering Albert Ahdoot, our observation so far of Albert A. Ahdoot business practices dba Colocation America Corporation dba Colocation America, Inc. dba ColocationUSA, dba Los Angeles Colocations dba Colocation America,Los Angeles Data Centers, Colocation America Facebook, ColocationUSA Twitter, datacenterandcolocation.com, colocationAmerica – la.bbb.org  is the  spamming of  search engines  so as to limit negative comments posted online about Colocation America and Mr. Ahdoot from appearing on page one of search results.

In summary, Albert Ahdoot engages in questionable business practice and is not trustworthy.



Address lookup
canonical name  Colocationamerica.com

aliases
addresses 67.203.25.149
Domain Whois record

Queried whois.internic.net with “dom colocationamerica.com”…

Domain Name: COLOCATIONAMERICA.COM
Registrar: GODADDY.COM, INC.
Whois Server: whois.godaddy.com
Referral URL: http://registrar.godaddy.com
Name Server: NS1.26DNS.COM
Name Server: NS2.26DNS.COM
Status: clientDeleteProhibited
Status: clientRenewProhibited
Status: clientTransferProhibited
Status: clientUpdateProhibited
Updated Date: 12-jul-2010
Creation Date: 29-mar-2005
Expiration Date: 10-oct-2012

Last update of whois database: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 01:29:54 UTC
Queried whois.godaddy.com with “colocationamerica.com”…

Registrant:
Colocation
9360 W. Flamingo Rd.
Suite 110-178
Las Vegas, Nevada 89147
United States

Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: COLOCATIONAMERICA.COM
Created on: 29-Mar-05  <======
Expires on: 10-Oct-12
Last Updated on: 12-Jul-10

Administrative Contact:
America, Colocation Support@ColocationAmerica.com
Colocation
9360 W. Flamingo Rd.
Suite 110-178
Las Vegas, Nevada 89147
United States
+1(800)296-8915 Fax —

Technical Contact:
America, Colocation Support@ColocationAmerica.com
Colocation
9360 W. Flamingo Rd.
Suite 110-178
Las Vegas, Nevada 89147
United States
+1.800-296-8915 Fax —

Domain servers in listed order:
NS1.26DNS.COM
NS2.26DNS.COM
Network Whois record

Queried whois.arin.net with “n ! NET-67-203-25-144-1″…

NetRange: 67.203.25.144 – 67.203.25.159
CIDR: 67.203.25.144/28
OriginAS: AS21769
NetName: RECREATIVE
NetHandle: NET-67-203-25-144-1
Parent: NET-67-203-0-0-1
NetType: Reassigned
RegDate: 2009-01-12
Updated: 2009-01-12
Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-67-203-25-144-1

CustName: Recreative Co.
Address: 5441 North East River Road
Address: Suite # 1002
City: Chicago
StateProv: IL
PostalCode: 60656
Country: US
RegDate: 2009-01-12
Updated: 2011-03-19
Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/customer/C02130283

OrgAbuseHandle: ABUSE1755-ARIN
OrgAbuseName: Abuse Department
OrgAbusePhone: +1-800-296-8915
OrgAbuseEmail: abuse@colocationamerica.com
OrgAbuseRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/ABUSE1755-ARIN

OrgTechHandle: NOC1792-ARIN
OrgTechName: Network Operations Center
OrgTechPhone: +1-800-296-8915
OrgTechEmail: noc@colocationamerica.com
OrgTechRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/NOC1792-ARIN

OrgNOCHandle: NOC1792-ARIN
OrgNOCName: Network Operations Center
OrgNOCPhone: +1-800-296-8915
OrgNOCEmail: noc@colocationamerica.com
OrgNOCRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/NOC1792-ARIN

RAbuseHandle: NOC1792-ARIN
RAbuseName: Network Operations Center
RAbusePhone: +1-800-296-8915
RAbuseEmail: noc@colocationamerica.com
RAbuseRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/NOC1792-ARIN

RTechHandle: NOC1792-ARIN
RTechName: Network Operations Center
RTechPhone: +1-800-296-8915
RTechEmail: noc@colocationamerica.com
RTechRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/NOC1792-ARIN

RNOCHandle: NOC1792-ARIN
RNOCName: Network Operations Center
RNOCPhone: +1-800-296-8915
RNOCEmail: noc@colocationamerica.com
RNOCRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/NOC1792-ARIN
DNS records

name class type data time to live
colocationamerica.com IN MX
preference: 10
exchange: mail.colocationamerica.com
600s (00:10:00)
colocationamerica.com IN TXT v=spf1 ip4:208.70.253.18 208.70.252.22 67.203.25.146 67.203.25.148 67.203.25.149 a mx ip4:208.70.248.18 ~all 600s (00:10:00)
colocationamerica.com IN A 67.203.25.149 600s (00:10:00)
colocationamerica.com IN SOA
server: ns1.26dns.com
email: corp.multacom.com
serial: 2011050706
refresh: 7200
retry: 3600
expire: 1209600
minimum ttl: 600
600s (00:10:00)
colocationamerica.com IN NS ns2.26dns.com 86400s (1.00:00:00)
colocationamerica.com IN NS ns1.26dns.com 86400s (1.00:00:00)
149.25.203.67.in-addr.arpa IN PTR hosted.by.colocationamerica.com 3600s (01:00:00)
— end —

Read More – ScamFraudAlert-Blog


  • colocation america albert Ahdoot
  • colocation america hosting reviews
  • colocation america uptime
  • collocation america uptime
  • ColocationUSA
  • colocation america web hosting
  • colocation america corporation
  • colocation america inc
  • collocation america inc
  • collocation hosting
  • data centers colocation america
  • carrier neutral colocation america
  • colocation hosting
  • colocation america albert
  • holiday travel of america
  • colocation america review
  • colocation america coupon code
  • colocation america los angeles
  • data centers colocation america
  • carrier neutral colocation america
  • colocation hosting

Colocation America and UnitedLayer Management Ownership

  • Arman Khalili is currently the Founder, CEO and co-owner.
  • Peter Preuss[8] – Director of Systems Architecture and co-owner
  • Otto Grajeda [9]- Founder and co-owner
  • Albert A. Ahdoot – [10]- co-owner

Qlimax Consulting

The Purpose of this post is to ALERT you that the job you are about to apply for or may have applied FOR or is CONSIDERING APPLYING FOR is FRAUDULENT.

These job postings are an attempt to lure you into cashing counterfeit checks and have you wire funds via Western Union or MoneyGram. Essentially You Become A Money or RePackage Mule.

The identity of an individual or entity have been stolen along with fund from their bank accounts. You are being recruited to wire transfer these funds either by WESTERN UNION, MONEYGRAM, into your bank, a DOMESTIC BANK or FOREIGN BANK ACCOUNT

  1. Understanding The Cyber Theft Ring
  2. Money Mule Explained
  3. Protecting Yourself Against Money Mule
  4. Washingtonpost.com by Brian Kerbs
  5. Interview With A Money Mule
  6. Bobbear.co.UK ~ Historical Money Mule Sites

Callers from this number belong to a big huge scam. A family member fell prey to them and gave out banking info. They thought they were being hired for a legitimate job doing investments.

They claim to ftp money into your account then instruct you to keep a certain amount of money as commission but to immediately western union money to an account that is overseas. Fortunately, my family member realized this was fishy and reported it to the bank. Everything has been blocked.

All account info has been changed. Just a big pain for the individual. These people would have you western union the money that has never really cleared into your account and never really does but now you are out the money you western union overseas.

312-957-5688
815-315-9446

CONSULTING ACCESS LIMITED


The Purpose of this post is to ALERT you that the job you are about to apply for or may have applied FOR or is CONSIDERING APPLYING FOR is FRAUDULENT.

These job postings are an attempt to lure you into cashing counterfeit checks and have you wire funds via Western Union or MoneyGram. Essentially You Become A Money or RePackage Mule.

The identity of an individual or entity have been stolen along with fund from their bank accounts. You are being recruited to wire transfer these funds either by WESTERN UNION, MONEYGRAM, into your bank, a DOMESTIC BANK or FOREIGN BANK ACCOUNT

  1. Understanding The Cyber Theft Ring
  2. Money Mule Explained
  3. Protecting Yourself Against Money Mule
  4. Washingtonpost.com by Brian Kerbs
  5. Interview With A Money Mule
  6. Bobbear.co.UK ~ Historical Money Mule Sites

CONSULTING ACCESS LIMITED

213.229.113.6 resolves to 213-229-113-6.static.as29550.net
The following A records are set to 213.229.113.6:

  1. alitech-uk.com
  2. ariz-itlead-experts-llc.com
  3. ariz-itlead-experts-llc.net
  4. bonotti-it.com
  5. computer-experts-corp.com
  6. computer-experts-corp.net
  7. consultingaccessltd.net
  8. consultingaglimited.com
  9. consultingaglimited.net
  10. consultingccs.net
  11. consultingguruinc.com
  12. consultingguruinc.net
  13. dynamic-llc.net
  14. it-dynamic-us.com
  15. usa-itdynamic.net
  16. debrey-ltd.com
  17. debreyltd.com
  18. ex-ectsrl.net
  19. finance-businessuk.net
  20. financial-limited.com
  21. financial-limited.net
  22. finhelpltd.com
  23. finhelpltd.net
  24. finsysconsultancyuk.com
  25. finsysconsultancyuk.net
  26. focuscomputer-ltd.com
  27. focuscomputer-ltd.net
  28. ftransfer-ltd.net
  29. goods-co.com
  30. haup-geit-support-co.com
  31. haygeckltd.com
  32. haygeckltd.net
  33. imperial-solltd.com
  34. imperial-solltd.net
  35. it-alliancetec.net
  36. it-lab-ltd.net
  37. it-lab-uk.com
  38. it-multimedia-uk.com
  39. it-works-ltduk.net
  40. ittech-ltd.com
  41. ittech-ltd.net
  42. jitfinance-group.com
  43. jitfinance-group.net
  44. macabay-llc.net
  45. moubonltd.com
  46. outsoursing-direct-ltd.net
  47. seap-srl.com
  48. seap-srl.net
  49. swifttransfer-group.com
  50. teamlogicit-itcompany.com
  51. teamlogicit-itcompany.net
  52. techservices-uk-ltd.com
  53. techservices-uk-ltd.net
  54. uk-advanceltd.com
  55. uk-it-air-media.net
  56. uk-it-valley-ltd.com
  57. uk-itservices-ltd.com
  58. uk-itworks-ltd.com
  59. uk-outsourcing-direct.com
  60. ukalitech.com
  61. kcontactconsulting.net
  62. ukcontactconsultingltd.com
  63. ukitabsolution-ltd.net
  64. ukwalltradenetworks.com
  65. us-globalconsultinginc.com
  66. walstar-corp.net
  67. workshopint-ltd.com
  68. workshopintltd.net
  69. worldconnectuk.net
  70. your-sikder.net

WhoIs ~ jobbingtree.com

Jobbing tree contacts you saying there is a job for you and that Fraud Alertthey will pre-interview you over the phone to see if you are a good fit for your future employer.

When they start the questions, they ask you if you have a computer at home (first clue it is not for the job offered). Second they say it will take about 20-25 minutes. Then they ask you: Are you interested in pursuing an education? and after you say:NO. The supposed “interview” ends.

My take is they are fishing for candidates to sell them as leads to educational institutions. They are trying to sell a course or courses.
I would sincerely doubt if anyone ever gets a job through Jobbingtree.com.

Jobbing Tree
P.O. Box 620878,
Oviedo, FL 32765
http://www.jobbingtree.com
(407) 641-4161

– See more at:
http://www.bbb.org/central-florida/business-reviews/job-listing-and-advisory-services/jobbing-tree-in-oviedo-fl-204516252#sthash.Sm7tg3F8.dpuf

Jobbing Tree

WhoIs ~ offerspecial.net

Address lookup
canonical name offerspecial.net

aliases
addresses 209.140.29.116
Domain Whois record

Queried whois.internic.net with “dom offerspecial.net

Domain Name: OFFERSPECIAL.NET
Registrar: REGISTER.COM, INC.
Whois Server: whois.register.com
Referral URL: http://www.register.com
Name Server: NS.BUILDMICRO.NET
Status: clientTransferProhibited
Updated Date: 22-feb-2013
Creation Date: 22-feb-2013
Expiration Date: 22-feb-2014

Last update of whois database: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:07:00 UTC
Queried whois.register.com with “offerspecial.net

Registrar Name….: Register.com
Registrar Whois…: whois.register.com
Registrar Homepage: http://www.register.com

Domain Name: offerspecial.net
Created on…………..: 2013-02-22
Expires on…………..: 2014-02-22

Administrative Contact:
Infinite Properties
Infinite Properties
1335 Rocking W. Drive #275
Bishop, CA 93514
US
Phone: +1.2092471042
Email: info@infinitepropert.net

Technical Contact:
Infinite Properties
Infinite Properties
1335 Rocking W. Drive #275
Bishop, CA 93514
US
Phone: +1.2092471042
Email: info@infinitepropert.net

DNS Servers:
ns.buildmicro.net

Network Whois record

Queried whois.arin.net with “n 209.140.29.116″…

NetRange: 209.140.16.0 – 209.140.31.255
CIDR: 209.140.16.0/20
OriginAS: AS3595
NetName: LH-GOLD-NETWORK
NetHandle: NET-209-140-16-0-1
Parent: NET-209-0-0-0-0
NetType: Direct Allocation
RegDate: 2010-12-15
Updated: 2012-02-24
Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-209-140-16-0-1

OrgName: Landis Holdings Inc
OrgId: LANDI-3
Address: PO BOX 1108
City: Fulshear
StateProv: TX
PostalCode: 77441
Country: US
RegDate: 2008-10-24
Updated: 2011-09-24
Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/LANDI-3

OrgAbuseHandle: ADMIN2505-ARIN
OrgAbuseName: Admin and Abuse
OrgAbusePhone: +1-800-659-9585
OrgAbuseEmail: abuse@nocdirect.com
OrgAbuseRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/ADMIN2505-ARIN

OrgTechHandle: ADMIN2505-ARIN
OrgTechName: Admin and Abuse
OrgTechPhone: +1-800-659-9585
OrgTechEmail: abuse@nocdirect.com
OrgTechRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/ADMIN2505-ARIN

RTechHandle: GL538-ARIN
RTechName: Landis, Greg
RTechPhone: +1-888-636-9451
RTechEmail: admin@nocdirect.com
RTechRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/GL538-ARIN

RNOCHandle: GL538-ARIN
RNOCName: Landis, Greg
RNOCPhone: +1-888-636-9451
RNOCEmail: admin@nocdirect.com
RNOCRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/GL538-ARIN

RAbuseHandle: ABUSE370-ARIN
RAbuseName: Abuse
RAbusePhone: +1-713-960-1502
RAbuseEmail: abuse@jaguarpc.com
RAbuseRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/ABUSE370-ARIN

DNS records
name class type data time to live
offerspecial.net IN SOA
server: ns.buildmicro.net
email: ns@buildmicro.net
serial: 2013022204
refresh: 3600
retry: 900
expire: 1209600
minimum ttl: 43200
86400s (1.00:00:00)
offerspecial.net IN MX
preference: 10
exchange: offerspecial.net
86400s (1.00:00:00)
offerspecial.net IN NS ns.buildmicro.net 86400s (1.00:00:00)
offerspecial.net IN A 209.140.29.116 86400s (1.00:00:00)
offerspecial.net IN TXT v=spf1 ip4:209.140.29.0/24 -all 86400s (1.00:00:00)
116.29.140.209.in-addr.arpa IN PTR b2bigdeal.net 14400s (04:00:00)
29.140.209.in-addr.arpa IN SOA
server: ns.nocdirect.com
email: admin@nocdirect.com
serial: 2012072969
refresh: 86400
retry: 7200
expire: 3600000
minimum ttl: 86400
86400s (1.00:00:00)
29.140.209.in-addr.arpa IN RRSIG
type covered: NSEC (47)
algorithm: RSA/SHA-1 (5)
labels: 5
original ttl: 10800 (03:00:00)
signature expiration: 2013-03-09 13:01:25Z
signature inception: 2013-02-27 13:01:25Z
key tag: 8795
signer’s name: 209.in-addr.arpa
signature:
(1024 bits)

10800s (03:00:00)
29.140.209.in-addr.arpa IN NSEC
next domain name: 3.140.209.in-addr.arpa
record types: NS RRSIG NSEC
10800s (03:00:00)
29.140.209.in-addr.arpa IN NS ns2.nocdirect.com 14400s (04:00:00)
29.140.209.in-addr.arpa IN NS ns.nocdirect.com 14400s (04:00:00)

— end —